Archive for June, 2007 Page 2 of 2



Equity index annuities still too good to be true

Houston Chronicle, June 4th, 2007

The most heavily marketed insurance product, the equity index
annuity, is becoming the most litigated insurance product. Attorneys
general in several states have filed suits against a number of vendors.
In addition, there are now four class-action suits against Allianz
Life, the most successful marketer of equity index annuities.

The primary complaint in these suits is that the annuities are
inappropriate investments for older people and that the buyers were not
made aware of the onerous penalties if money was withdrawn earlier than
the term of the contract.

In spite of this, the sales force is still out there, inviting
seniors to free seminars and free dinners to praise the glory of their
ultra-safe product. The National Association for Fixed Annuities
continues to lobby to keep equity index annuities from being considered
securities because it doesn’t want its marketing and sales to be
subject to SEC scrutiny.

Readers continue to ask me, “This equity index annuity sounds too good to be true. Is it?”

The nutshell answer: Yes, the equity index annuity story is too good to be true.

Mass Mutual analysis

Responding to my recent column
(“Equity Index Annuities: Long on Sizzle, Short on Steak”), the sales
force pulled no punches. They complained that the study I cited had
been done by economists who provide litigation support. Therefore, they
said, it was biased.

If I was a good reporter, they wrote, I would not have used such clearly tainted figures.

OK, then. I was just trying to keep things short and sweet. Here, at
the specific request of members of the equity index annuity sales
force, is some further data indicating that this product doesn’t cut it.

Let’s start with research from one of the largest and most respected
life insurance companies, Massachusetts Mutual. Several years ago it
sent an analysis to its sales force. It wanted to explain why Mass
Mutual wasn’t offering an EIA.

The analysis showed that over the 30-year period ending in December
2003, and assuming no dividends and a 9.4 percent annual cap on returns
(because EIA contracts generally have some form of upside limit), Mass
Mutual found that a typical equity index annuity would have provided a
return of only 5.8 percent a year.

Read more of this article.

Reverse Mortgages Common Among Many Black Families

Kansas City Call, June 4th, 2007

Spreading wealth throughout generations is one of the biggest problems
facing African Americans. Usually, heirs to the family fortune divide
jewelry, automobiles, a family home and of course household items and
bills.

However, the family fortune is beginning to dwindle as more
and more seniors, especially blacks, are opting to receive reverse
mortgages on their homes and receiving cash money.
Blacks are 49.8 percent more likely than any other race to obtain a reverse mortgage according to Fannie Mae.

Reverse mortgages is a method of borrowing money against the house
while the owner continues to occupy the home. The interest is simply
added as a mortgage to the property which is then paid off when one
dies and becomes the lender’s. The interest rates usually set by law
currently around 6 to 8 percent.

The fixed term reverse mortgages
is offered for a set period. Unfortunately, the homeowner must sell the
house at the end of the period and move out.

Therefore, this type
of loan is an absolute last ditch method and government counseling
offices will usually try to find some other type of assistance to help
the elderly in need of financial resources.

In 1987, the Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) set certain guidelines on
reverse mortgage loans it was willing to offer. Those limits lie
between $67,500 to $151,725 as set forth by Congress in 1993.

Other private lenders allow greater amounts and are popular in states
with higher real estate prices such as California, Maryland, New Jersey
and Florida for instance. Private lenders may not only charge interest
but take part in the appreciation in value of the property which is
normally expected to be the same as inflation. There are also upfront
fees, points and the like, so these can be fairly expensive to
implement and costly overall.

According to the New England
Review, a monitoring group for those seeking reverse mortgages, over 70
percent of households over age 62 own their home and 80 percent of
those have no mortgage.

Read more of this article.



NewRetirement Blogs Home