Archive for February, 2008

The Trajectory of Wealth in Retirement

Center for retirement research at Boston College, February 2008

As the baby boomers begin to retire, a great deal remains unknown about
the evolution of wealth toward the end of life. In this paper, we
develop a new measure of household resources that converts total
financial, nonfinancial, and annuitized assets into an expected annual
amount of wealth per person. We use this measure, which we call
“annualized comprehensive wealth” to investigate spend-down behavior
among older households in the Health and Retirement Study. Our analysis
indicates that, in (real) dollar terms, the median household’s wealth
declines more slowly than its remaining life expectancy, so that real
annualized wealth actually tends to rise with age over retirement.
Comparing the estimated age profiles for annualized wealth with
profiles simulated from several different life cycle models, we find
that a model that takes into account uncertain longevity, uncertain
medical expenses, and (for higher-income retirees) intended bequests
lines up best with the HRS data.

Read more of this article

NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement Calculator.

How the Income Tax Treatment of Saving and Social Security Benefits May Affect Boomers’ Retirement Incomes

Center for retirement research at Boston College, March 2008

Income tax provisions affect the buildup of retirement assets during
workers’ careers and after-tax income following retirement.  This paper
uses the Urban Institute’s DYNASIM model to simulate how potential
changes in the tax treatment of retirement saving, Social Security
benefits, and income from assets outside of retirement accounts may
affect boomers’ retirement incomes.  Results show that changes in the
income thresholds for taxing Social Security benefits have the largest
impact on middle-income boomers, while changes in contribution limits
for retirement saving plans and tax rates on capital gains and
dividends have the largest impact on the highest income boomers.

Read more of this article

NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement Calculator.

How Many Struggle to Get By in Retirement?

Center for retirement research at Boston College, December 2007

The official poverty measure in the United States fails to reflect
modern day economic resources and spending needs.  The official measure
is based only on cash income and does not include in-kind transfers,
capital gains and losses, taxes, out-of-pocket health spending, the
value of owner-occupied housing, or the potential income from financial
assets.  Also, the official poverty thresholds that define minimal
needs, set back in 1963 and updated to changes in the CPI, do not
capture current spending patterns.  These shortcomings especially
pertain to adults age 65 and older because their resources, needs, and
health expenses differ most dramatically from the assumptions reflected
in the official measure. 

This paper uses data from the 2004 Health and Retirement Study to
demonstrate how the poverty rate of adults age 65 and older changes
using alternative resource and threshold measures.  Results show that
alternative measures that account for health spending produce higher
poverty rates than the official measure, even those that include the
value of housing and financial assets.  Poverty remains concentrated
among singles (disproportionately women), blacks and Hispanics, and
adults age 85 and older regardless of how it is measured because these
populations have relatively little housing equity or financial assets. 
Higher alternative poverty rates among older adults show the importance
of protecting low-income groups when considering government reforms
that include benefit cuts or higher cost shares to improve Social
Security and Medicare solvency.

Read more of this article

Derry officials: Reverse mortgage not income

The Union Leader, February 27th, 2008

Reverse mortgage loans will no longer be counted as income for older
residents seeking municipal tax breaks, the town’s chief financial
officer said yesterday.

Last year, 15 residents 65 or older were
denied exemptions because of income; three of them had reverse
mortgages, CFO Frank Childs said. Officials changed the policy this
month after receiving word that it’s up to individual communities to
decide, he said.

Before the policy changed, Childs said, officials had been operating
under verbal instruction from the state to count reverse mortgages as
income. However, he said, “we didn’t believe before that it should be.”

Members of the Alliance of Derry Taxpayers raised the issue
after a man told them his application to receive exemptions was denied
because of his reverse mortgage loan. The alliance also successfully
pushed to alter exemption qualifications to make more senior citizens
eligible.

State Rep. Howie Lund, R-Derry, said he sought
clarification on the issue at the state level. In an e-mail to Lund,
George Blatsos, commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Revenue
Administration, said reverse mortgages are not considered income.
Childs said the town had changed its policy before the e-mail.

“The
obligation to repay offsets the benefit of having the loan proceeds,”
Blatsos wrote. “The recipient of the loan is in no better financial
position than he was before; in fact, he is worse off as interest
accrues on the debt.”

Although the issue is resolved in Derry,
Lund said, there may be other communities that count reverse mortgages
as income. Lund, a member of the taxpayer alliance, said legislation
could put communities across the state on the same page.

Doug
Newell, director of the taxpayers alliance, said the group considers
the policy change a victory. The alliance has sent surveys to elderly
residents to see what other kinds of changes they may want.

“I’m 55. I can’t speak for the elderly,” Newell said, adding, “I thought that it might be nice to begin a dialogue with them.”

Newell is running against Nick Arancio and Neil Wetherbee in the race for the District 3 council seat next month.

New Worries on Inflation and Homes

The New York Times, February 26th, 2008

Houses are getting cheaper by the month. Everything else is becoming more expensive.

Several economic reports released on Tuesday provided fresh evidence
that the economic pain of a prolonged slump in housing is being
compounded by the rising cost of oil, food, clothes and other goods.
Not surprisingly, a measure of consumer confidence fell to its lowest
level in nearly five years.

In addition to squeezing American homeowners, the confluence of
falling home prices and accelerating inflation is putting policy makers
in an increasingly tough position. If they move aggressively to cut
interest rates and stimulate the economy, they risk fueling inflation
further at a time consumers are already strained. But if they fail to
act boldly, the economy could weaken faster.

“The Fed is now having to walk a very fine line,” said Jane Caron,
chief economic strategist at Dwight Asset Management, an investment
firm that specializes in bonds. “We have clearly seen an acceleration
in inflation pressure in the last couple of months and the risk is that
the markets are going to react negatively to aggressive easing going
forward.”

Nonetheless, the stock market rebounded from an early decline on
Tuesday to close up for the day. The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock
index rose 0.7 percent, to 1,381.29, and the Dow Jones industrial
average was up 114.70 points, or 0.9 percent, to 12,684.92.

Energy and technology stocks led the market higher after oil prices surged above $100 again and I.B.M. announced that it would buy back $15 billion of its stock and raised its profit forecast.

In the bond market, investors snapped up inflation-protected
Treasuries, indicating that they were worried about higher prices. The
yield on the 10-year inflation-protected note, which moves in the
opposite direction of its price, dropped to 1.407 percent from 1.507.

The dollar fell to $1.4967 against the euro, its lowest level since
that currency was created. It was also trading near long-term lows
against other major world currencies like the Canadian and Australian
dollars.

A widely followed index of home prices in 20 metropolitan areas fell
by 9.1 percent in December from the month a year ago. Using a
three-month moving average, the index, the Standard & Poor’s
Case-Shiller, is falling at an annual pace of more than 20 percent. The
index tracks repeat sales of single-family homes; it does not include
condominiums.

Another index of home prices that covers more of the country but
does not track loans above $417,000 fell 0.3 percent in the fourth
quarter from the period in 2006. The index, compiled by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, showed prices declining in all states, except Maine.

The Labor Department reported that wholesale prices, which exclude
taxes and distribution costs, rose 1 percent in January, in contrast to
a drop of 0.3 percent in December 2007. Compared with a year ago,
prices were up 7.4 percent. Excluding food and energy prices, which are
more volatile from month to month, the index increased 2.3 percent from
a year ago, up from 2 percent in December.

The latest inflation report appears to corroborate a broader trend of higher prices.

Read more of this article

NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement Calculator.

No Country for Young Men

The Atlantic Online, February 23rd, 2008

It is cliché to speak of sleepy little
country towns, but my mother’s hometown goes beyond sleepy into Rip van
Winkle territory. Newark, New York, has more churches than bars. Neat
clapboards and stately Victorians line quiet streets wrapped tight
around the Erie Canal. Drive through Newark quickly, and it looks like
America’s past. Stay a little longer, and you begin to recognize it as
our future.

Walk into one of those churches on a typical Sunday morning, and you
will find only a few, startling islands of brown or blond hair amid a
sea of gray. Almost 20 percent of the population is over the age of 65.
(The town’s economic fortunes have declined along with those of the
Erie, and many younger workers have left.) On the street where my
mother grew up, and my aunt now lives, the only children you see are
visiting their grandparents.

The former Midlakes Middle School, which sits in neighboring Phelps,
has transmogrified into “Vienna Gardens,” a private independent-living
facility where my grandmother now lives. The bones of the schoolhouse
are still clearly visible under the carpet and overstuffed couches that
line the halls; the residents take their meals in the cavernous former
gymnasium. Vienna Gardens is home to 64 people, but the place has an
empty feel. The rent is out of the reach of many of the area’s seniors.

Those seniors, eventually, may end up at the county nursing home. It
is a new and lovely facility. But its supervisors are leery of slipping
into the red; most of its residents are on Medicaid, and the program’s
meager payments don’t cover costs. Any overruns would likely be made up
through taxes, and the seeds of a tax revolt appear to be germinating.
Local property taxes are already high: the school tax alone is 2.5
percent of assessed home value each year. Many of the town’s residents
grouse about their tax bills. Local school officials are nervously
eyeing nearby Monroe County, where the county executive wants to cope
with budget woes by diverting school money into county coffers.

As Newark has aged, its commerce and the nature of its workforce
have shifted. The Wal-Mart in town is busy, even on a weekday
afternoon, and several local clothing stores have closed. While neither
phenomenon is unique to Newark, the town’s aging has doubtlessly
contributed to both: big-box stores appeal to the elderly not only
because of lower pricing, but also because they put more goods in one
place, enabling seniors who can’t walk far, or who have difficulty
getting into and out of cars, to make the most of each shopping trip.
At the local community college, new programs in health care are
proliferating.

At a gala event held at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.,
on October 15, Kathleen Casey-Kirschling— born one second after
midnight on New Year’s Day 1946—became the first Baby Boomer to file
for Social Security benefits. Over roughly the next 20 years, close to
80 million of her fellow Boomers will follow suit. By 2030, America
will look like Newark. Almost one in five Americans will be in life’s
golden years, up from about one in eight today.

A lot of op-eds have been written about what will happen when the
Boomers retire. Like our policy debates, they tend to focus, somewhat
remarkably, on accounting. Will the Social Security Trust Fund
go bankrupt? Does the trust fund really exist? These questions are too
narrow, and they don’t yield particularly useful answers. As Newark’s
experience suggests, the retirement of the Boomers will transform the
texture of our society. How will it change our economy, our culture,
our politics? When it’s over, will America look better, worse, or just
different?

Read more of this article

NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement Calculator.

Proposed Federal Housing Rescue Plan a Taxpayer Funded Bailout for People Who Failed the Marshmallow Test


I just read the NY Times article on a proposed “HomeOwner Rescue Plan” for people who’s houses are now worth less than their mortgages. In the both the article and the comments there are a number of people who say that unless this bailout happens, then millions of people could lose their homes or have to severely curtail their lifestyles and that this is un-acceptable in America. The main rationale seems to be that if some people bear economic pain then it could hurt everyone else. Some of the proposals include forgiving mortgage amounts that are above the current value of the house. The last time I checked the only people offering “pay what you can afford” plan are charities. If we start forgiving debts and freezing ARMs then we’re letting the US government into the business of re-writing private sector contracts. When Hugo Chavez in Venezuela nationalizes Exxon assets - he gets demonized…but if the US Nationalizes the debt of people who bought houses they can’t afford that’s saving the country?

There is and will be a lot of economic pain as a result of this mess, but it’s better that the economic pain is born by the people who made the bad decisions versus people who made good decisions and lived within their means. People who make good economic decisions tend to use resouces efficiently – if the US wants to maintain its position in the world, then we need to use our resources efficiently. It should be a net positive if we reward (or don’t punish) people who’s values and actions are aligned with prudent decision making and efficiency vs. the “I need it now” mentality that has been at the fore until recently.

Reminder to self – blog on the Marshmallow Test in the near future

There are plenty of people in the US that used the loose credit environment to take on debt that they could not afford, so that they could live an unsustainable lifestyle. That’s their decision – but I shouldn’t have to pay higher taxes, so to pay off their new Lexus or whatever lifestyle choice they made. If someone didn’t take the time to understand the loan they were getting – well – tough cookies – hopefully they’ll learn a lesson and won’t make the same mistake next time.

Let’s not forget that the vast majority of people out there are not going to lose their homes. If some people lose their houses – well there are lots of renters out there that I’m sure would be happy to buy them up at rational prices. If housing prices come down – well then more people can afford to buy houses. There are plenty of people out there who have been waiting to buy houses at prices that won’t keep them in debt the rest of their lives – just because some people decided they couldn’t wait that doesn’t mean I want to pay for their house/car/RV/Vegas vacation/etc.

It’s better for us to clear out this mess all at once – if the government tries to bail out homeowners – it will just extend the period of pain before this is worked through and re-direct the resources of the productive prudent people in this country to subsidize people who paid irrational prices for their houses.

Below an interesting chart to put housing prices in perspective.

[housingmarket_nytimes.jpg]

What You Need to Know About Reverse Mortgages

Fox Business, February 22nd, 2008

With today’s retirees living longer than expected, many of them are
turning to other sources of income in their golden years. A buzzword
among many seniors is “reverse mortgage,” though critics say they’re
often too good to be true. So what is a reverse mortgage, and what does
it really do?

A reverse mortgage allows homeowners over the age of 62 to earn a
monthly or lump sum payment on their home’s equity. A lender typically
pays a homeowner according to a formula derived from the homeowner’s
age, the current interest rate and the appraised value of their home,
according to the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development, or HUD.

Homeowners can get more money the older
they are and the more valuable their home. Reverse mortgages differ
from traditional mortgages because no repayment is required until the
homeowner passes away, or ceases to use the home as their primary
residence, according to HUD.

“For a lot of elderly, retired
people, cash flow is limited as they move to a fixed income,” said
Robert Walters, chief economist and divisional vice president of the
Capital Markets Group for Quicken Loans Inc.

“A lot of
Americans find their principle source of income is their home, yet they
don’t want to leave it, because it’s where they raised their children.
This puts them in an unhealthy dilemma, because they can either stay
but not live well, or leave and get equity. This is where the reverse
mortgage comes in, allowing them to stay and get equity,” Walters said,
who added that the reverse mortgage program in the US. had changed
significantly over the last number of years.

“Now it’s
entirely an FHA [Federal Housing Administration] program, and the
amount lenders can charge is highly regulated,” he said. “Anyone
thinking of getting a reverse mortgage will get a lot of counseling
from various nonprofits, which are designated by the FHA and HUD.”

Once
a homeowner takes a reverse mortgage, they can choose different ways to
receive their funds, either via “tenure,” receiving monthly payments,
or via a “line of credit,” which is essentially a lump sum payment the
borrower can pull from at any time. Fortunately, the lender cannot take
away a home if the borrower outlives the loan. As long as the borrower
remains in the home and continues to pay taxes and insurance, they will
never owe more than what the home is worth, according to Walters.

Read more of this article

About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com

Career Food Executive Finds New Employment in Reverse Mortgages

The Memphis Daily News, February 22nd, 2008

For
more than 30 years, David Sorin owned and operated barbecue
restaurants. Also during that time, he worked as a consultant, helping
other people get their businesses up and running.

Most recently, the 65-year-old was a consultant to the owners of Old Venice Pizza Co. and the owners of Atlanta Bread Co.

But
as Sorin has gotten older, his career interests have shifted from
barbecue to reverse mortgages. He’s now a reverse mortgage specialist
with Residential Loan Centers of America, Memphis headquarters.

“It’s
very interesting because I get to deal with a very diversified group of
people because everybody’s case and challenges are so different,” Sorin
said. “Some people are trying to pay off a mortgage, some people are
trying to get money for their parents or themselves to get in home
care, some people use the money to travel with.

“(There
are) some people who use the money just because they want to have the
money because they feel like they’re qualified for it and their
children don’t need the money.”

Read more of this article

About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com

Rescues for Homeowners in Debt Weighed

The New York Times, February 22th, 2008

WASHINGTON — Prodded in part by some of the nation’s biggest banks, the
Bush administration and Congress are considering costly new proposals
for the government to rescue hundreds of thousands of homeowners whose
mortgages are higher than the value of their houses.

Not since the Depression has a larger share of Americans owed more
on their homes than they are worth. With the collapse of the housing
boom, nearly 8.8 million homeowners, or 10.3 percent of the total, are
underwater. That is more than double the percentage just a year ago,
according to a new estimate of the damage by Moody’s Economy.com.

Administration
officials say they still oppose any taxpayer bailout for either people
who borrowed more than they could afford or banks that made foolish
loans during the height of the speculative bubble in housing.

But
with the current efforts to arrest the housing collapse so far bearing
little fruit, Washington is being forced to explore new ideas, among
them the idea of a federal mortgage guarantee for troubled borrowers.

And
policy makers are listening to proposals from industry and community
groups to use government funds to purchase and refinance billions of
dollars in mortgages now in danger of default.

Many owners are
only gradually becoming aware that their homes would sell for less than
the debt against them — a phenomenon, said Richard T. Curtin, director
of the Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers, that is
“beginning to weigh on people, making them uncertain and nervous about
the future.”

Read more of this article

About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com



NewRetirement Blogs Home