Archive for October 30th, 2008

Survey: Baby Boomers Will Claim Social Security at Age 62

US News & World Report - October 28, 2008


Many baby boomers plan to sign up for their Social Security checks as soon as possible. A new survey found that 45 percent of those currently 61 years old will begin getting Social Security at age 62, the first year recipients can apply. Boomers cited financial necessity, health and longevity concerns, and a desire to collect as much as possible from the system as their reasons for early claiming.


But collecting your due at age 62 could be a mistake. Social Security benefits will increase by approximately 7 percent each year this group of boomers delays claiming from age 62 to 66 and by 8 percent per year until age 70. That is almost certainly a better return than investors are getting from their investments right now, and it can insure healthy retirees against the possibility of outliving their savings.


Baby boomers say they can’t afford to delay claiming because they need the money now. A Fidelity Investments survey of 300 61-year-olds found that only 10 percent plan to wait until their full retirement age to claim, and an additional 9 percent say they will claim between ages 67 and 70. The baby boomers will use the funds to pay for basic living expenses, such as food, utility costs, and mortgage payments (77 percent). And they expect Social Security to make up as much as half of their retirement income. “Many Americans who are within one year of beginning to collect their Social Security retirement benefits may be planning to rely too much on it, considering Social Security currently only funds a little more than one third, or 37 percent, of an average retiree’s income,” says Carolyn Clancy, an executive vice president at Fidelity.


Another reason boomers may be signing up for Social Security as soon as possible is a pervasive fear that the government will not pay out the promised benefits. A different survey of 5,000 older employees by consulting firm Watson Wyatt released earlier this month found that 51 percent of workers ages 50 to 64 are not confident about receiving their promised Social Security checks after they retire. “People with less overall confidence in their retirement resources are likely to worry more about Social Security and Medicare because they cannot rely on personal savings,” says Alan Glickstein, a senior retirement consultant at Watson Wyatt. “And these fears may be further exacerbated by the recent turmoil in financial markets.”


Current market conditions have caused a quarter of the 61-year-olds in the survey to delay their retirement or claim Social Security earlier than planned, Fidelity found. And 38 percent plan to work at least part time after signing up, which could temporarily reduce payments, depending on the amount earned.


The Social Security Administration unveiled an online calculator in July that allows workers to more accurately predict what future benefits will be at various retirement dates.


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement Calculator

Are Annuities At Risk Now? Some Answers

The Wall Street Journal - October 29, 2008


Many owners of variable annuities have endured a double whammy lately: Their investment-account balances have taken a hit, as have the financial-strength ratings on the insurers that issued their annuities.


Agents and brokers say they’ve received a flood of calls from clients in recent weeks concerned about the safety of their variable annuities, in part fueled by the stock-market turmoil and the government rescue of insurer American International Group Inc.


Regulators and consumer advocates say life-insurance companies rarely have failed and seldom do so suddenly, so there is no need for alarm. And in the rare instance a company becomes insolvent, states ensure that guaranty funds protect both cash values and death benefits up to certain limits.


And taking rash action is a potentially costly move: Cashing out of a variable annuity early can invoke surrender charges, generally as high as 10% for as long as 10 years. Those who cash out before age 59½ also face tax liabilities and penalties.


In all, there were 35.1 million individual annuity contracts in force at the end of 2007, with a total value exceeding $2.02 trillion, according to LIMRA International, a nonprofit industry group that compiles life-insurance data, and Morningstar Inc. Here are answers to some common questions investors may have about annuities:


Q: How do annuities work?


A: Annuities are tax-deferred insurance contracts bought once, or with a series of payments, that offer the owners either a lump sum or a series of payouts after an accumulation period. Unlike other retirement vehicles such as an individual retirement account or a 401(k), annuities have no legal limits on tax-deferred contributions.


Q: What’s the difference between fixed and variable annuities?


A: Fixed annuities earn a guaranteed interest rate during a certain period. They are backed by assets in an insurance company’s general account, usually bonds. Fixed annuities depend entirely on the financial soundness of insurers, which are regulated primarily by state insurance departments.


Variable annuities can also come with guaranteed benefits, such as a death benefit and a minimum return, riders for which the buyers generally pay extra. In other ways, though, they’re quite different: A portion of deposits go to the insurance company to cover administrative costs and guaranteed benefits; the rest is invested in a portfolio of mutual fund-like investments. These accounts are separate from the rest of the insurance contract and belong to the annuity owner, so they’re not as vulnerable to the insurer’s fate.


Variable annuities, however, are more exposed to market risks. If annuity owners’ investments perform well, there’s the potential upside of a bigger payout. But if they do poorly, as many have recently, income falls, too. Investors can shift their fund holdings, however, to lower-volatility choices such as bond funds.


Q: How have annuities been affected by recent market conditions?


A: Many variable annuities have gone through the same gut-churning volatility as mutual funds in general. Partly as a result, while sales fixed annuities rose 39% in the first six months of 2008 from a year earlier, sales of variable annuities overall declined 6% in the same period, according to LIMRA International.


Q: Should I be worried if the share price of my insurer declines?


A: Not necessarily. In some cases, analysts say, publicly traded insurance companies’ stock prices have plunged partly because of their efforts to raise capital. And while raising capital can dilute existing shares, it also improves an insurer’s ability to pay claims. Hence, a decline in the stock value of a company doesn’t always spell immediate trouble for annuities or life-insurance policies.


Q: Should I worry if the financial-strength rating of my insurer declines?


A: Possibly. Financial-strength ratings, supplied by rating agencies, are an evaluation of the ability of a company to make good on its guarantees. A slip from an excellent financial-strength rating from one of the five agencies — Fitch Inc., A.M. Best Co., Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s or TheStreet.com — to a slightly lower rating that is still in the secure range isn’t cause for alarm, experts say. But multiple downgrades are a good reason to keep an eye on the company.


Through Sept. 30, 6.5% of the life/annuity and health-insurance companies followed by rating agency A.M. Best had been downgraded, though most remained in the “secure” range, meaning they are still regarded as financially sound.


Of course, buyers of new annuities should only buy from top-rated companies, consumer advocates say. You can find information on financial strength of companies licensed in your state by linking to your state’s insurance department, at www.naic.org, the Web site of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.


Q: What happens when a company founders?


A: State regulators usually monitor struggling companies and work with them to try to get additional capital — or to sell the company to a stronger insurer that can make good on all of its claims. State receivers, who include the state insurance commissioner of the company’s home state, often help find other insurers to take over the annuities from the troubled company. Annuity owners then make payments to the new company and collect payouts from it. Otherwise the terms of the annuity usually remain the same.


Q: What happens if no insurer wants to take over the annuity contracts of a failed insurer?


A: If an insurer is declared insolvent by a court and is liquidated, state laws require companies to pay annuity (and insurance policy) owners first and in full before paying claims of other creditors. State guaranty associations — funded by other insurers — then make good on the annuities and policies. Death benefits, for instance, are often protected up to $300,000. Cash values are often protected to a maximum of $100,000. (See www.nolhga.com, the National Organization of Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Associations, for state-by-state terms.)


With variable annuities, as with fixed contracts, the associations protect the death benefits, guaranteed minimums, and other contract guarantees. But investment account losses because of market declines generally aren’t covered.


Q: What are my options if my insurer is at risk of insolvency?


A: Regulators and consumer groups warn that annuity owners, especially those who bought contracts recently, often stand to lose more when rashly surrendering an annuity than they would risk from the insurance company’s failure. That’s because the guaranty funds protect their money up to legal limits, while surrender charges and other penalties can take a chunk of an annuity’s balance.


Check with your state insurance department for updates about the financial strength of insurers. If your annuity contract is still in the surrender period, often five to seven years, and the contract is below state guaranty limits, you may decide to wait and see if the company can muddle through. But if your surrender period is over or nearly finished, and a company has deteriorated enough to make you uncomfortable, you could consider a Section 1035 tax-free exchange, named for a section of the Internal Revenue Code, into another annuity contract from a higher-rated insurer. Don’t forget, however, that starting a new contract will involve a new surrender period and charges, new commissions and new fees.


Don’t allow a sales rep from a competing company to scare you, however, into replacing an annuity. There are state laws against “poaching” customers by making false claims about the financial condition of another insurer.


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement Calculator

"Flawed" 401(k) Laws Putting Retirement at Risk

Consumer Affairs – October 29, 2008


Congress needs to reform flawed 401(k) laws that could push back retirement for millions of Americans whose savings have collapsed along with the stock market, a University of Illinois elder law expert says.


Law professor Richard L. Kaplan says 401(k) accounts were meant to supplement traditional defined-benefit pensions, but have evolved into the sole nest egg for the bulk of U.S. workers whose employers offer any kind of savings program.


The shift, he says, has left workers with the illusion of a company-funded pension when in fact it’s largely their own money in investments that are generally tethered to the stock market, which has lost $8 trillion during an economic meltdown over the last year.


“People mistakenly think they have an employer pension plan and don’t understand that their retirement income, other than Social Security, is in very serious jeopardy right now,” said Kaplan, who wrote a 2004 article on the risks of 401(k) plans that appeared in the Arizona Law Review.


He argues that Congress should rewrite laws to allow 401(k) programs only in concert with defined-benefit pensions, even if it means more companies join the roughly half of U.S. employers that offer no retirement savings plan.


“As matters stand currently, workers are being tricked,” Kaplan said. “They think they have a pension plan at work when it’s really their own money and every aspect of the 401(k) program — participation, contribution level, investment allocation, withdrawal arrangement — is problematic when it’s the person’s only savings plan.”


Even the lure of cashing in when employers offer matching contributions is “less than compelling,” he said. Matches are typically small, and many employers have reduced or eliminated them in recent years. Beyond that, he says, workers who change jobs after just a few years often lose those employer contributions anyway.


“If people want to save for their retirement, they can always set up an Individual Retirement Account at virtually any financial institution, including their neighborhood bank,” Kaplan said. “The dollar limit on contributions is lower for IRAs than for employer-based plans, but the vast majority of 401(k) plan contributions are within current IRA limits and thus would not be impacted by this difference.”


When 401(k) laws were adopted in 1978, the new savings accounts were envisioned as part of a three-pronged plan for retirement, a supplement for monthly checks from Social Security and conventional defined-benefit plans, he said.


But as 401(k) plans were being launched, Kaplan said, employers already were veering away from defined-benefit programs because of new costs created by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, adopted four years earlier.


The act, intended to make worker pensions more secure, also made defined-benefit plans more expensive through new regulations and insurance premiums to safeguard pension funds, he said.


Only about half of employers offer any retirement savings program and, of those, nearly 60 percent offer just a 401(k) plan, Kaplan said. Many provide little or no company contribution, a trend he says has quickened in the last few years.


“We’re only now beginning to see a cohort of people on the cusp of retirement who have the bulk of their retirement funding coming from 401(k) plans,” he said. “It’s a relatively new phenomenon.”


Because the stock market plunge has withered savings, many of those workers may have to postpone retirement and keep working, Kaplan said. That, in turn, would reduce job openings for younger workers and boost employer health insurance costs due to an older workforce.


“You might also just have more older people who are poor, which was the historical norm,” Kaplan said. “Before Social Security, it was not unusual for older people to be poor or to move in with sons or daughters, not because they couldn’t physically get around but because those were the people who had a significant source of income.”


In his 2004 law review article, Kaplan argued that flaws with 401(k) plans made a case against efforts afoot then to privatize Social Security, which he said would create the same risks and put future retirees in further financial peril. He doubts the move will resurface any time soon in the wake of the lingering turmoil on Wall Street.


“The cause of Social Security privatization has been set back considerably,” said Kaplan.


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement Calculator



NewRetirement Blogs Home