Archive for March, 2009 Page 2 of 4



Top 3 Emerging Mortgage Scams To Watch Out For

The Consumerist – March 19, 2009


In its recent annual report to the Mortgage Banker’s Association, the Mortgage Asset Research Institute described three emerging mortgage fraud schemes that are either new or increasing in popularity.





Foreclosure Prevention Schemes – These generally involve fraudsters posing as professional, knowledgeable foreclosure specialists. Homeowners facing the threat of foreclosure and nearing eviction are contacted by these “foreclosure specialists” who promise to work out their loan problems or buy their home and offer the homeowners tenancy. Unfortunately for the homeowner, the fraudster has no intention of following through with these promises and instead will manipulate the homeowner into deeding the property to them. Once the fraudster obtains the signed documents, a false lien release is generally filed or leveraged to secure funds from a fabricated sale or refinance on the property. In many cases, the homeowner is under the belief that they will rent the property for a period of time until they are in a better position to regain ownership rights. The fraudster continues to accept payments made by the homeowner while selling the property, absconding with the funds, and eventually evicting the homeowners. Perpetrators of this type of fraud often move from town to town, sizing up their opportunities, quickly scamming as many homeowners as possible, inflicting costly damages, and then moving on to the next location.


Elderly and Immigrant Identity Fraud — While not new, elderly and immigrant fraud is regaining popularity. In this predatory practice elderly and non English-speaking consumers are taken advantage of by fraudsters who steal their identities and use them in strawbuying or other property transactions. This is currently happening in some reverse mortgage situations. Similarly, some immigrants who rent properties are discovering that their identities have been used on fabricated loan transactions. A simple inquiry about a loan product that leverages investment or rental properties can be enough to obtain information for use on fabricated loan transactions.

Builder Bail-Out Fraud
– This involves securing funds for condominium conversion or planned community development properties that, unbeknownst to the investor, will not be completed. The scams entail multiple purchases from would-be investors or false identities on fabricated loan transactions. Investors are lured by photos or inspections of a few converted units used as models with promises of further rehabilitation of remaining units. Once the contracts are in place, the fraud continues as the perpetrator secures funding for the contracts; however, no additional work is done and the investors and lenders are left with incomplete and, in some cases, uninhabitable
dilapidated buildings.

See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement

8 Tips for Paying for Health Care in Retirement

US News & World Report - March 16, 2009


It’s difficult to predict what your health care expenses will be in retirement. Jack Dickinson, 65, thought he was one of the lucky ones. His 34 years as a General Motors sales and marketing manager came with two gold-plated benefits: a pension and lifetime medical coverage. And Dickinson was lucky indeed–until GM scrapped retiree health care coverage this year for about 100,000 white-collar retirees, him included. The beleaguered auto giant did raise monthly pension payments by $300 to help retirees buy their own coverage. But “it does not replace, by any means, the excellent coverage that GM gave us,” says Dickinson, a retiree in Hoover, Ala. “If you go on the open market and try to replace everything, it is not available.” Here’s some tips on how to cope with health care expenses in retirement:


Don’t count on employer benefits. Most current employees will never face Dickinson’s quandary because they won’t be eligible for retiree health insurance through their former employer in the first place. Less than a third of firms with 200 or more workers offered retiree health benefits in 2008, down from the 66 percent that did so in 1988, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation survey. Among small companies, retiree coverage is much more rare: only 4 percent offer it. But even if your employer offers retiree health insurance, don’t count on receiving benefits. Retiree health insurance agreements often include clauses that give the company the right to modify or terminate the program at any time. If benefits continue, retirees are likely to face higher premiums, increased out-of-pocket expenses, and tougher eligibility requirements. And there’s nothing that safeguards retiree health insurance benefits like the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., which, in private-sector pension plans, pays workers if a plan or a company fails.


Try to make it to Medicare. How do you protect yourself from crippling medical bills in the face of nonexistent or disappearing health insurance? The answer might seem to be seeking out an employer that provides health care benefits until age 65, when you qualify for Medicare. Sounds simple enough, if you can manage to stay employed with company benefits in this tough economy. If you’re laid off, find out if you’re eligible for a spouse’s health plan and COBRA continuation coverage through your former company. That coverage lasts up to 18 months. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, passed in February, promises employees who were laid off between Sept. 1, 2008, and Dec. 31, 2009, a 65 percent subsidy toward COBRA premiums for up to nine months.


Workers who retire before they qualify for Medicare at age 65 often face the steepest health care costs. The average cost of premiums for employer-provided coverage for retirees under 65 is $13,308 a year, according to a Towers Perrin survey. The typical early retiree is expected to pick up $6,960 of that tab. But retirees who don’t have employer-subsidized insurance or coverage through a spouse will pay even more. Costs vary widely for individuals. Those who have bad health habits or chronic illnesses generally pay more–if they can even get coverage.


Plan for Medicare costs. Retirees with Medicare face significant out-of-pocket costs. Major health care expenses include premiums for Medicare Part B (physician and outpatient hospital services) and Part D (prescription drug-related expenses), co-payments, coinsurance, deductibles, and excluded benefits like dental care, eyeglasses, and hearing aids. A couple retiring in 2010 would need nearly $206,000 in 2007 dollars to buy an annuity sufficient enough to cover out-of-pocket health care costs in retirement, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. A couple retiring in 2040 would need more than $491,000. Other studies come up with similarly large numbers. Fidelity Investments says a 65-year-old couple retiring in 2008 will need approximately $225,000 to cover medical costs in retirement. That doesn’t even include over-the-counter medications, most dental services, and long-term care. The Employee Benefit Research Institute figures a married couple will need a staggering $305,000, just to have a 90 percent chance of being able to pay for all out-of-pocket retirement health expenses (the money could be paid in part out of retirement income, however.) Dickinson, who recently signed up for Medicare, runs a website for fellow GM retirees, where he posts tips for navigating the sign-up process. After GM announced retiree health-insurance cuts, the site’s traffic quadrupled. “The older retirees losing their benefits are trying to do the gymnastics required to enter the Medicare maze,” Dickinson says. “You’ve got to go to each provider and determine which one has the best coverage for you and at what premium price. It’s very confusing.”


Consider working longer. Many economists think most people should plan to work well past the current average retirement age, 63, in part to help finance health expenses. Working longer allows you to funnel extra cash into your nest egg, gives your investments more time to recover from recent market losses, and cuts the length of time your retirement stash needs to last. Workers age 50 and older can deposit up to $22,000 in a traditional tax-deferred 401(k) this year, up $1,500 from 2008. Social Security benefits also increase for each year you delay claiming benefits up until age 70. “People simply can’t afford to cover their future health-care costs unless they have more assets, and people are responding to that by working longer,” says Richard Johnson, an Urban Institute researcher. There is some evidence that continuing to work at a challenging–but not stressful–job or staying active and engaged by volunteering or taking up hobbies can help you stay healthy even longer. “Mental and physical exercise improve overall brain fitness,” says Gene Cohen, director of the Center on Aging, Health, and Humanities at George Washington University. “Mastery and a sense of accomplishment can improve mental fitness by boosting the immune system.”


Factor in long-term care. What’s often the greatest retiree medical expense of all–long-term care—generally isn’t covered by Medicare. Last year, a private nursing home room cost an average of $76,460 a year, or $209 per day, according to a Genworth Financial survey. Costs vary considerably by state, and range from an average of $125 a day in Louisiana to $515 in Alaska. More inexpensive options are available, but even they could torpedo most retirees’ budgets. The average rate for a home-health aide is $19 an hour. That comes to $43,884 per year for 44 hours a week of care. A private one-bedroom unit in an assisted-living facility typically costs $36,090 annually. And the most frugal long-term care option, adult day care, still runs $15,236 per year, on average, for care five days a week, Genworth Financial found.


Consider long-term care insurance…carefully. Long-term-care insurance can help protect you from some of these catastrophic costs–at a hefty price. AARP estimates that a 65-year-old in good health can expect to pay between $2,000 and $3,000 a year for a policy that covers nursing-home and home care. And Fidelity Investments calculated that a couple, both 65 in 2008, would need $85,000 just to insure against a lifetime of long-term-care expenses. Before you buy long-term care insurance, you should get answers to plenty of questions: how to cancel the policy; what happens if you stop paying the premiums; how many times you can renew; how long coverage lasts; what the maximum payout is (and whether it is indexed for inflation); and what needs to happen before you can begin claiming your benefits. “These policies are written stating very extensively what they will cover, and 20 years later when you start using long-term-care services, there may be some new modality of service that is not covered by your plan,” cautions Johnson. You can check up on the financial health of insurers at A.M. Best, Moody’s, or Standard & Poor’s and with your state insurance department.


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement


 

Reverse mortgage: Windfall or problem?

The News Press - March 15, 2009


Richard Wylie had a reversal of fortune two years ago – but don’t worry, he’s doing better than before.


Wylie, 75, a retired Cape Coral police officer, got a reverse mortgage on his house under a program regulated by the Federal Housing Administration, which insures the loans.


The program, known as HECM (Home Equity Conversion Mortgage), lets people 62 and older get a reverse mortgage that allows them to get a loan for a certain percentage of the equity they have in their homes. As long as they keep the property up and pay the taxes, the loan doesn’t need to be paid back until the last person on the mortgage dies or leaves the house.


Recent changes made by Congress have increased interest in the program by upping the amount people can borrow (the exact maximum increases as someone grows older), said Bronwyn Belling, reverse mortgage specialist with the American Association of Retired Persons Foundation.


But, she said, getting a HECM loan can be tricky and the law requires borrowers to talk to trained counselors to make sure the complicated process is fully understood.


For one thing, she said, with hefty upfront fees, “If you take out a reverse mortgage and only stay in the house for a couple of years it’s a very expensive proposition.”


Also, Belling said, borrowers who suddenly have a large chunk of money available to them need to be reminded that they still have to take care of the house and can’t necessarily just run through the windfall.


Sometimes, she said, people take advantage of naive borrowers by getting them into risky or inappropriate investments.


Wylie said the program worked out well in his case.


“The way I had it set up it paid off my existing mortgage so I didn’t have my mortgage to pay,” effectively increasing his income by $650 a month, he said.


He’s used the extra money to travel and generally enjoy life more, Wylie said, and hasn’t touched the remaining $55,000 he had left over after paying the mortgage. It’s now in a certificate of deposit paying 4.5 percent interest.


Belling said HECM, which accounts for 95 percent of all reverse mortgages, is increasingly popular: the program was created in 1989 but 300,000 of the 500,000 issued have been in the past three years.


But David Johnson of Naples-based Reverse Mortgage Group said actually getting one done in today’s down real estate market can be difficult.


“We’re struggling with appraised values” to get the borrower enough to pay off his mortgage, which often is the goal, he said.


Borrowers often would have been able to get a better deal before prices fell in the housing collapse that has reduced the value of homes, Johnson said. “They should have done a reverse mortgage three or four years ago.”


On the other hand, said Stephanie Kirch of Reverse Mortgage in Naples, borrowers can have bad credit or a recent foreclosure in their past without being disqualified because the loan is paid off when the house is sold. “I look at this as a lifeline, a Get Out of Jail Free card for seniors.”


Belling cautioned that like traditional mortgages, reverse ones carry risks that didn’t exist a few years ago. “Appreciation is an assumption we all had for years and it’s not a good assumption these days. There’s no guarantee you’ll be able to refinance your house years from now and get more money out of the house.”


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement

Baby Boomers are Changing Their Retirement Plans

US News & World Report – March 12, 2009


Do you remember 2007? Baby boomers, although they were never prolific savers, were optimistic about their retirement prospects. The stock market was trending upward nicely and home values were inflating fast. Baby boomers have certainly changed their retirement plans since then.


The MetLife Mature Market Institute surveyed 910 1946-born baby boomers in 2007, when they were approximately age 61, about their retirement plans. Then they managed to track down 562 of them again in late 2008 to see if they followed through. Many didn’t. Here’s a look at how one extraordinary year altered baby boomer’s retirement plans.


Original plan: In 2007, about 11 percent of boomers born in 1946 said they planned to retire at age 62.


Actual plan. Of those boomers, 71 percent did not retire. The top reasons for continuing to work were the current economic situation (26 percent), the need for income from work (20 percent), and because they liked to work or would be bored not working (17 percent). Only 15 percent of these boomers actually followed through with their retirement plans. And 6 percent managed to cut back their hours to part-time or seasonal employment.


Original plan: About 38 percent of the baby boomers said they would retire at age 63 or later in 2007.


Actual plan: Most of the boomers who planned to work past age 62 (67 percent) have not changed their planned retirement age. About 31 percent will further postpone their retirement date. Only 2 percent plan to retire earlier.


Original plan: Almost one-quarter (23 percent) of 1946-born boomers said they would sign up for Social Security benefits as soon as possible at age 62.


Actual plan: The majority (75 percent) did end up claiming their due in 2008. The other quarter of these boomers has largely decided to delay claiming Social Security for a variety of reasons including not being ready to retire or a preference to keep working (33 percent), needing the income (24 percent), not yet eligible (17 percent), to keep health insurance (16 percent), to build up their check amounts by delaying claiming (8 percent), or to avoid the penalty on earnings if you retire early (5 percent).


Original plan. Almost half (48 percent) of the baby boomers surveyed in 2007 planned to collect Social Security after age 62.


Actual plan: Since 2007, the majority of these survey respondents (80 percent) have not changed their plans. However, 17 percent indicated that they will now collect Social Security benefits later than originally planned, many because they are still working. Only 3 percent of the baby boomers indicated they would collect Social Security benefits earlier than originally planned. Top reasons include a disability (28 percent), health reasons (18 percent), and because they want to (8 percent).


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement



 

The Commercial Republic

The New York Times - March 16, 2009


Over the centuries, the United States has been most conspicuous for one trait: manic energy. Americans work longer hours than any other people. We switch jobs more frequently, move more often, earn more and consume more.


This energy was first aroused by abundance, by the tantalizing sense that dazzling wealth was available just over the next hill. But it has also been sustained by a popular culture that celebrates commercial ambition. From Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton, through Horatio Alger and Norman Vincent Peale, up until Donald Trump and Jim Cramer, popular figures have always emerged to champion the American gospel of success, encouraging middle-class people to strive, risk and make money.


This gospel gets dented during each of the nation’s financial crises, but it always returns with a vengeance. The late 19th century was a time of economic turmoil. Yet it was also a time when this commercial creed was preached most fervently. Andrew Carnegie published “The Gospel of Wealth.” Elbert Hubbard published “A Message to Garcia,” which celebrated industriousness and ambition and sold nearly 40 million copies. The Baptist minister Russell Conwell traveled the country delivering his “Acres of Diamonds” sermon to rapturous audiences more than 6,000 times.


“I say that the opportunity to get rich, to attain unto great wealth, is here now within the reach of almost every man and woman who hears me speak tonight!” Conwell thundered to his audiences. “I say that you ought to get rich, and it is your duty to get rich … Money is power, and you ought to be reasonably ambitious to have it. You ought, because you can do more good with it than you could without it.”


The Great Depression suppressed economic activity, but not the commercial spirit. In the middle of it, Dale Carnegie published “How to Win Friends and Influence People,” which promised imminent success and went on to sell more copies than any other book to that point but the Bible. The stagflation of the 1970s didn’t discredit capitalism. It gave rise to the supply-side movement and the apotheosis of the entrepreneur.


In short, the United States will never be Europe. It was born as a commercial republic. It’s addicted to the pace of commercial enterprise. After periodic pauses, the country inevitably returns to its elemental nature.


The U.S. is in one of those pauses today. It has been odd, over the past six months, not to have the gospel of success as part of the normal background music of life. You go about your day, taking in the news and the new movies, books and songs, and only gradually do you become aware that there is an absence. There are no aspirational stories of rags-to-riches success floating around. There are no new how-to-get-rich enthusiasms. There are few magazine covers breathlessly telling readers that some new possibility — biotechnology, nanotechnology — is about to change everything. That part of American culture that stokes ambition and encourages risk has gone silent.


We are now in an astonishingly noncommercial moment. Risk is out of favor. The financial world is abashed. Enterprise is suspended. The public culture is dominated by one downbeat story after another as members of the educated class explore and enjoy the humiliation of the capitalist vulgarians.


Washington is temporarily at the center of the nation’s economic gravity and a noncommercial administration holds sway. This is an administration that has many lawyers and academics but almost no businesspeople in it, let alone self-made entrepreneurs. The president speaks passionately about education and health care reform, but he is strangely aloof from the banking crisis and displays no passion when speaking about commercial drive and success.


But if there is one thing we can be sure of, this pause will not last. The cultural DNA of the past 400 years will not be erased. The pendulum will swing hard. The gospel of success will recapture the imagination.


Somewhere right now there’s probably a smart publisher searching for the most unabashed, ambitious, pro-wealth, pro-success manuscript she can find, and in about three months she’ll pile it up in the nation’s bookstores. Somewhere there’s probably a TV producer thinking of hiring Jim Cramer to do a show to tell story after story of unapologetic business success. Somewhere there’s a politician finding a way to ride the commercial renaissance that is bound to come, ready to explain how government can sometimes nurture entrepreneurial greatness and sometimes should get out of the way.


Walt Whitman got America right in his essay, “Democratic Vistas.” He acknowledged the vulgarity of the American success drive. He toted up its moral failings. But in the end, he accepted his country’s “extreme business energy,” its “almost maniacal appetite for wealth.” He knew that the country’s dreams were all built upon that energy and drive, and eventually the spirit of commercial optimism would always prevail.


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement

Strange But True: Free Loan From Social Security

Center for Retirement Research at Boston College – March 17, 2009



When to claim Social Security is one of the most important decisions Americans make when approaching retirement. Currently, retirees can choose between claiming at the Full Retirement Age1 and receiving full benefits, claiming as early as age 62 but receiving reduced benefits, or delaying retirement to as late as age 70 and collecting higher monthly benefits. The reductions and the delayed retirement credits are approximately actuarially fair for the person with average life expectancy. Early retirement benefits are lowered by an amount that offsets the longer period for which they will be received. The delayed retirement option offers higher benefits but for a shorter remaining lifetime. Thus, on average, workers will receive the same lifetime benefits regardless of when they claim between the ages of 62 and 70.


Recently, several unconventional claiming strategies have come to light that have the potential to pay higher lifetime benefits to some individuals and increase system costs.2 This brief focuses on one of these strategies, which we call the “Free Loan from Social Security” strategy. The first section outlines the procedure and incentives of employing this strategy. The second section, using data from the Health and Retirement Study, presents estimates of the cost to Social Security under three different scenarios and describes who would gain. The final section concludes that the estimated annual $5.5 billion to $11.0 billion cost of allowing free loans from Social Security is likely to increase substantially over time.


Free Loan from Social Security


This strategy originates from a little-known part of the law that allows individuals who are already collecting benefits to change their minds and start over.3 For example, an individual can claim Social Security at age 62 and then reclaim at age 70 and receive a higher benefit, provided he pays back the benefits he has received. Because the claimant is only required to return the nominal amount of the collected benefits, he could invest the money that he receives and keep the interest.4 In essence, the claimant is a borrower who is required to pay back only the principal of a “loan,” making this strategy akin to an interest-free loan from Social Security. An individual with average life expectancy will increase his lifetime benefits by the amount of the investment earnings. Should the claimant die before reaching average life expectancy, this strategy will involve a loss. But the strategy always dominates simply claiming at age 70 because it provides “early retirement” benefit payments for those who die prior to age 70 and the additional interest for those who “repay the loan” and reclaim at 70.


An example might help. Based on Social Security life tables, the average 62-year old born in 1944 has a life expectancy of approximately 21 years. His Full Retirement Age is 66, at which point he is entitled to 100 percent of his primary insurance amount (PIA).5 If he opts for early retirement at 62, he will receive 75 percent of his PIA; if he postpones retirement past 66, he will accrue delayed retirement credits, culminating in a maximum benefit of 132 percent of PIA at age 70. As already noted, under conventional claiming strategies Social Security is actuarially fair. In other words, the average retired individual with a life expectancy of 83 will receive the same lifetime benefits no matter what age between 62 and 70 he claims. In Figure 1, areas A and B show the benefits received if the individual claims at 62, while areas C and B are the benefits received if claiming at 70. The value of area A, the benefits earned before 70, is equal to the value of area C, the change in benefits due to delayed retirement. If that same individual takes advantage of the “Free Loan from Social Security” strategy he will collect benefits equal to area A and earn interest on A equal to A´, but he needs to pay back only area A. In total, then, this individual would end up with a Social Security benefit equal to areas B and C and an investment gain equal to A´.6 The gain to the individual and the loss to the system is therefore the value of A´.


The implication from Figure 1 is that any individual with average life expectancy – age 83 – will benefit from implementing this strategy and his gain is area A´. But some individuals whose life expectancy is lower than the average can also benefit. Assume that the individual who claimed at 70 adopts the “Free Loan” strategy. He first claims at 62, invests the benefits paid to him, and reclaims at 70. As noted above, reclaiming at 70 requires the individual to pay back the value of the benefits received over the prior eight years, but not the interest. Keeping the interest gives him a ‘head-start’ on reaching the break-even age compared to an individual claiming at 62 under the conventional strategy. To break-even, he simply needs to live until he receives total benefits from Social Security that, together with the interest, add up to the total benefits received by a conventional age-62 claimant. Because of the interest earnings, this point occurs at age 81.7


See the full paper in PDF…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement Calculator


 

Commentary: We owe oldest Americans an apology

CNN – March 15, 2009


As the country frets about extricating itself from the financial mess, there is one group of Americans to whom the rest of us owe the most sincere words of apology.


That group consists of the oldest of our fellow citizens — the men and women who went through the Great Depression when they were young, who fought and endured World War II when they were just a little older, and who had hoped for a sense of peace and tranquility in their final years on this earth.


They don’t deserve what they are going through. You hear it again and again from money experts: Take the long view of the economy. If you don’t need cash from your stock market accounts in the next five to 10 years, leave it in there. Time will heal our current woes — the economy, even when it’s in tatters, runs in cycles. Just wait it out and be patient. Especially young people — fiscal stability will arrive again in your lifetime. You’ll see.


Nice words. Yet they leave out that one group of people — the people who have a right to be terrified when they are told the economy will only be brutal in the short term. They leave out the people to whom the short term is all they have: our parents. Our grandparents. The men and women who never should have had to worry about their personal security again.


It’s never wise to generalize, yet it is safe to say that, as a group, the men and women who endured the Depression and World War II played it straight when it came to putting their trust in financial institutions. They didn’t try to game the system; they didn’t believe in esoteric money schemes. As a group, they were cautious, because the two defining national events of their lives taught them that you can never really count on anything. They watched their own parents suffer during the Depression, they went overseas for years on end when our nation asked them to save the world, and when they came home, to the prosperity of the Eisenhower years, they crossed their fingers and hoped the good times were not an illusion.


The mistakes and tricks and reckless gambles of the supposedly sophisticated masters of Wall Street have wounded these men and women, many of whom, before the last year, had never even heard the names of the men who ran the biggest investment banks and brokerage firms. Which is why what those oldest Americans are going through is so unfair. Once more, in a lifetime that has been filled with sacrifices, they are having to pay the terrible price for decisions in which they had no say.


For a while, after Tom Brokaw’s “The Greatest Generation” focused belated attention on the quietly heroic lives of our parents and grandparents, it finally seemed that the oldest Americans were being allowed to take a victory lap. One of the points Brokaw made was that, for all the pain those men and women lived through, they seldom complained. They just soldiered on.


That appeared to be the elegiac theme of their final chapter: a warm acknowledgment by us, to whom they gave a better world, that we understood and honored their steadfastness — that we appreciated and were moved by the uncomplaining way they had made it through their hardest years.


We didn’t realize that they would be asked to do it again, in 2009 — we didn’t realize that our parents and grandparents, the vestiges of their retirement income suddenly diminished and threatened, would be asked once more to stoically accept hardships they had done nothing to bring upon themselves.


Think of the disdain they must feel for the Wall Street titans who have hurt them. When they hear about a brokerage executive who spends $1,400 on a wastebasket, their first thought undoubtedly is not that the man has taken advantage of his shareholders, or of the federal government. Their first thought — remember, these men and women were children of the Depression — is that the man must be a fool, a complete and utter sucker, to pay someone $1,400 for such an item. If you grew up having nothing, your contempt for such an idiotic expenditure is just about absolute. And you wonder about a society in which a person who would spend money that way is expected to prudently handle the money of others.


All that the oldest Americans asked for, in their final years, is a sense of safety, of stability. Twice in the nation’s history, they knew what it was like to go to sleep night after night with their stomachs knotted in fear. What we as a country owed them was nights, at the end, when they never again had to feel that dread in the darkness.


Now they are feeling it, and there is nothing that we — their sons and daughters, their grandsons and granddaughters — can do to convince them that their fear in the night is groundless. What they are being forced to go through now is — in the most elemental sense of this word — a shame. I hope they know how sorry we are.


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement

Baby Boomers ‘Under Water’

The New York Times – March 13, 2009


A recent report suggests that the housing-market slump is hitting baby boomers particularly hard: many middle-aged homeowners had been so seduced by the rising prices of years past that they failed to save for retirement and may now owe more than their homes are worth.


The Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, which released the report last month, estimated that 30 percent of homeowners aged 45 to 54 were in this predicament, known as being “under water.” (About 15 percent of older baby boomers, 55 to 64, fell into that category as well.)


So, if these people were forced to sell their homes now, they would have to bring cash to the closing.


The center’s report also found that baby boomers in the 45-to-54 group saw their overall net worth plummet by about 45 percent over the last five years, to a median level of $94,200 from $172,400.


While the drop partly reflected the meltdown of Wall Street, Dean Baker, the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, said that conservative estimates showed that home equity accounted for about $20,000 of the net income figure.


Another factor that has led to a decline in personal wealth is what the report calls “the near zero level of savings nationally” from 2004 to 2009.


“As a result of the bubble-inflated values of their homes, tens of millions of families opted not to save during what would typically be their peak saving years,” the report said.


The center used 2004 consumer finance data from the Federal Reserve Board that measured a typical consumer’s wealth in several categories, including stocks and home equity. Researchers then reduced those values in accordance with the drop in the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index and the median sale price of a house as tracked by the National Association of Realtors. The November S.&P./Case-Shiller 20-city price index was also factored into the projections.


Mr. Baker said he suspected that fewer baby boomer homeowners were under water in the New York metropolitan region than in other parts of the country, particularly areas where prices have fallen sharply, like Florida, Arizona and Rust Belt states like Michigan and Ohio. But he said that because of the financial industry’s persistent woes, owners in the New York area could see more significant declines in home prices this year.


Indeed, many areas in the region are already suffering. According to a report this month by Integrated Asset Services, a Denver-based real estate consulting firm, prices in Fairfield County, Conn., have dropped 42 percent since their peak in 2006, while prices in Passaic County, N.J., have dropped 26 percent.


Those homeowners around age 60 whose mortgages are under water, and who might now be considering selling, should carefully weigh their options, said Richard E. Austin, a financial adviser with Lincoln Financial Advisors in Rye Brook, N.Y. Selling the house would cost them money, he noted, which could mean that they might need to liquidate other assets — even retirement savings plans like 401(k)’s.


But Mr. Austin said that if these homeowners expected real estate prices to decline for years, and if they wanted to retire someplace other than their current home, selling now could shield them from deeper losses in the future.


“I wouldn’t recommend that as the first option, because I’m more of an optimist,” Mr. Austin said, adding that a better option might be to rent out the house while waiting for home prices to rebound.


Even baby boomers who aren’t under water could have a more difficult time affording retirement. According to the center’s report, five years ago, the median baby boomer household, with people aged 45 to 54, had enough net assets to generate about $14,000 in annual interest once the homeowners reached age 65.


Now, that figure is just under $8,000.


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement


Retirement Accounts Have Now Lost $3.4 Trillion

US News & World Report – March 13, 2009


In October 2008, the Congressional Budget Office reported that stock market turmoil wiped out roughly $2 trillion of Americans’ retirement savings over just 15 months. Since then, the stock market has continued to shudder and retirement savers have lost even more.


A new estimate found that retirement accounts, including 401(k)s and IRAs, have lost $3.4 trillion between September 30, 2007 and March 6, 2009. Assets in retirement accounts were valued at approximately $8.5 trillion on September 30, 2007 (expressed in constant 2009 dollars), according to calculations by Mauricio Soto, a research associate at the Urban Institute, but have since plunged 40 percent to $5.1 trillion. About 70 percent of these assets were invested in stocks. During the same period the stock market overall lost 56 percent of its value, a decline of about $13 trillion.


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement


 

Plan Mentally for Retirement Not Just Financially

Chron Business News – March 9, 2009


Many people entering retirement envision a life of fun and relaxation, but the opposite can be true. Without the social contacts that come from reporting to an office everyday, some retirees feel isolated. Others feel depression from an emptiness that comes with sudden idle time.


Psychologist Nancy Schlossberg’s latest of nine books, “Revitalizing Retirement: Reshaping Your Identity, Relationships, and Purpose” says you should spend as much time preparing your psychological portfolio as you do your financial one. In today’s recession, which is leaving millions of workers suddenly jobless, her tips also can help unemployed workers develop a plan for moving on.


Schlossberg is professor emerita of the College of Education at the University of Maryland and co-president of TransitionWorks, a consulting company that focuses on helping people adjust to life changes in Adelphia, Md.


Q: Your book discusses the need to develop a psychological portfolio for retirement, what exactly does that mean and why is it important?


A: For many workers, the psychological adjustment to retirement is as difficult as the financial one. I make the case that people go to a financial adviser and consult often yearly, sometimes more frequently. They go to a physician to get a checkup. But no one is checking up on their psychological portfolio because they didn’t really have one. It’s important, not just for retirement, but for every major change in life — career changes, marriage, divorce. Those things change the way you define yourself, your relationships and often change your sense of purpose.


The more people I interviewed, the more I began to realize three common issues — identity, relationships and purpose — arise when people retire. These issues make up the psychological portfolio that I refer to and should be honestly assessed and managed if one is to be happy.


Q: For many people psychological issues aren’t as concrete as financial decisions. Can you explain how to go about assessing these areas and managing them?


A: The major thing people realize after they retire is that their identity has been compromised. While working, they knew who they were — a roofer, a bricklayer, a college professor, an accountant. They had a tag, an identity. People don’t think about that. They don’t realize that after retirement, the issue of identity is critical.


Finding interests that help you focus on who you are is the key. The book illustrates points with real life examples including a police officer who couldn’t figure out who he was after retirement. He was divorced and directionless until he agreed to work in a temporary job helping a family member manage a hotel. The job gave him a new identity and new working relationships. He remarried and 10 years later is still doing the job.


Q: How about relationships and finding a new purpose in retirement. Why are these important issues?


A: Many people feel an intense vacuum after leaving the workplace because their social network of co-workers is gone. They need to find a substitute for work colleagues. Many people find a part-time job that gives them interaction with others. Some find fulfillment in volunteering with a community organization or becoming involved with a church group. They must be sure to find some community of people.


It’s also likely that they’ll have to renegotiate the relationship with their spouse or life partner. Many men and women find it very trying when they first retire because they’re not ready to be with one another 24 hours a day, seven days a week.


Finding a new purpose is integral to the happiness of many retirees. Many people must feel as if they matter and often lose that sense when they no longer work every day. They must place themselves in situations in which they feel appreciated and depended upon. People need to look in their communities for places where they feel they matter. Giving back is one of the best ways to do this — working at a soup kitchen or in some other capacity in which they’re helping others.


See the full article…


About Reverse Mortgages:  Learn all about reverse mortgages at NewRetirement.com


Professional Financial Advisors:  Find out what a financial advisor can do for you at NewRetirement.com.


Annuity Advice for Retirement:   Evaluate and compare annuities at NewRetirement.com


NewRetirement Retirement Calculator:   Assess your retirement plan with the NewRetirement Retirement



NewRetirement Blogs Home