Archive for April 28th, 2010

Tap retirement savings early without penalty

Marketwatch, April 28th, 2010

For many older workers the recession has been
especially tough. Salaries and benefits have been cut, insurance costs
have risen. That slimmer paycheck isn’t going as far as it once did.

But there is one little known, if troublesome, way that some older
workers might be able to make up some of the shortfall: You can tap into
your nest egg a bit early.

The law dictating when you can use your retirement money is
straightforward: Funds withdrawn from an individual retirement account
before age 59 1/2 are subject to a 10% hit. But the Internal Revenue
Service permits a loophole, part of Section 72(t) of the federal tax
code, where the penalty does not apply if the money is paid out in set
amounts over time.

Be careful. Using this exemption isn’t so straightforward — it does
reduce savings you will need for many years to come.

To qualify, you must take what the IRS calls a series of “substantially
equal periodic payments,” or SEPP, from your traditional IRA. (Roth IRA
withdrawals aren’t penalized.)

This is where the simple part ends.

No one-time payouts

“Periodic payments” means taking installments at least annually for a
minimum of five years or until age 59 1/2, whichever is longer. So if
you’re 50 years old, the SEPP will be in effect for almost a decade
before you can stop. Someone who is 57 years old will be bound to the
plan until age 62, well past the time when the 10% penalty would no
longer have applied.

“Substantially equal” means the periodic payments must adhere to one of
three formulas: a required minimum distribution method; an amortization
method, or the annuitization method.

What’s the difference? The size of the payments can be substantial.
Minimum distribution gives the lowest payment but fluctuates with the
value of your account, whereas the other two options supply higher,
fixed, payments.

These calculations are based on savings, age, life expectancy and a
government-supplied “reasonable” interest rate. You don’t have to do the
math — many financial-planning Web sites have handy 72(t) calculators.
Check out Bankrate.com or, for a comprehensive guide, go to 72t on the
Net (72t.net).

Read more of this article.

Editor’s Note:  No link this time, just a careful warning.  While this article does describe accurately the mechanics, upsides, and downsides to performing this type of operation, it is fraught with danger.  The very concept of drawing upon retirement savings to fund existing costs, even necessary ones, places many people in the gravest of trouble.  Unless there is a desperate need, even if you fully intend to pay the money back, NewRetirement strongly encourages would-be retirees to very very carefully consider this course of action, no matter how sure or necessary it may appear.

Putnam: Workers need to save more for retirement

Boston Globe, April 27th, 2010

Americans are less likely to fully fund their individual retirement
accounts this year, in some cases because they lack the cash, according
to a new survey from Putnam
Investments
, a Boston mutual funds company that offers retirement
planning services.

Almost 40 percent fewer Americans expect to fully fund their IRAs
this year than they did in 2009, and the survey of 1,000 Americans found
that there is much confusion and uncertainty about IRA investing.

Besides a lack of cash, respondents cited a preference for keeping
money available for other purposes and concerns about risk as reasons
for not fully funding retirement accounts, the survey said.

While a recent rule change makes more Americans eligible to open Roth
IRAs, 41 percent of survey respondents think they will have more money
in the long run if they pay taxes later with a traditional IRA rather
than converting to a Roth IRA and paying taxes now.

Read more of this article.

Professional Retirement Financial Planners:  It’s important even (in fact especially) in times of economic turmoil to keep an objective view of the long term.  Trends that you might react to on gut instinct or without proper research may not be the right way to go.  A professional financial adviser can help you determine what is the best course of action to preserve and secure your retirement.

Five Dumb Things People Do With Their Money

ABC News, April 28th, 2010

Some days, I get tired of telling people what to do with their money.

You tell them one thing; they do another and then wonder why they have
so little.

Maybe it’s time for a new approach. Forget about telling them what to
do.

Instead, tell people what not to do with their money. Help them avoid
the stupid mistakes that can spell financial disaster, and then maybe
things like buying a home, saving for retirement
and paying for college will be easier.

Toward that end, I’ve compiled my own list of the worst money moves you
can make. The list is by no means exhaustive, as there are an endless
number of ways to screw up your financial life.

But avoid these money mistakes, and you’ll stand a better chance of
achieving your financial goals.

1. Invest in something you don’t understand: It’s often
said that financial products are sold, not bought. That means there’s a
salesperson behind the transaction, pushing a security or insurance
policy that the buyer did not go looking for and does not truly
understand.

I’m talking about things like variable annuities, limited partnerships,
life settlements or reverse convertibles.

There is a legitimate place for many of these financial products, but
quite often their costs are too high and their benefits not as great as
presented. Often, the biggest advantage is the commission paid to the
broker.

My general rule of thumb is that the less you understand about a
financial product, the more it’s going to cost you. So unless you
understand it, don’t buy it.

2. Refuse to sell at a profit for tax reasons: Remember
when General Electric fetched $57 a share in 2000 or Home Depot stock
approach $70 in 1999? I hope you sold some at the time and paid the
capital gains taxes if you held in taxable accounts.

Because you can be sure there were investors who refused to sell simply
to avoid paying the IRS. They allowed their investment decisions to be
dictated by taxes rather than the investing fundamentals.

The painful consequences of doing this became pronounced during the
financial meltdown of 2008 for the owners of bank stocks. For many
investors, bank stocks had become legacy investments handed down through
the generations. Their values had skyrocketed as banks were bought and
sold in a consolidation wave.

Read more of this article.

Retirement Calculator:  If you’ve made any of the above mistakes, might it not be time to consider the state of your finances?  Our retirement calculator can help you do just that.



NewRetirement Blogs Home