Archive for June 30th, 2010

Taking a conservative approach to reverse mortgages

Reverse Mortgage Daily, June 29th, 2010

Taking a conservative approach to writing reverse mortgages, Sun West
Mortgage, Cerritos, Calif., prefers to be careful on the front-end and
“aggressive” on the servicing side, according to Pavan Agarwal,
vice-president of the family-owned firm. Agarwal, who joined the company
right out of college, says Sun West is “proactive in servicing,”
particularly when taxes come due,” calling borrowers to remind them.
“Most seniors don’t default because they intend to,” Agarwal notes,
“but, rather, they forget to make the payments. It’s mostly a training
and re-education” issue, he says.

Not surprisingly, origination volumes are down lately at Sun West,
which got into the reverse mortgage business in 2004. Agarwal tells RMD
that the company has experienced a 30 to 40 percent reduction in HECM
volume this year due to the reduced principal limit factors and a
depressed housing market. “However, Sun West has more than compensated
for the drop through an increase in its FHA forward and commercial
lending channels,” he assures listeners.

However, the generally depressed housing market is an area of
concern, says Agarwal, explaining that reverse mortgage originators
should be beware of investors who attempt to put a senior in an
upside-down property. “If you originate a loan like that,” he warns,
“you [end up having] seniors who may not be committed to the property;
who may never have owned a property before and doesn’t understand what
the responsibilities of a homeowner are.”

Read more of this article.

About Reverse Mortgages:
  Conservative approaches are all well and good, but generally speaking, the best approach to something like a reverse mortgage is to get all of the options available to you on the table.  NewRetirement can help you do that.

Getting the most out of Social Security

News Observer, June 27th, 2010

Q: I’m 66 and my wife will soon be
62. I love my work, plan to work until age 70 and delay my Social
Security benefits until I retire.

For most of our married life, my wife stayed
at home, raised our children, took care of the house and supported me in
my career. She did work outside the home for a brief period before we
had children and is eligible for a small amount of Social Security based
on her own earnings.

We
want to maximize the Social Security benefits in our old age because we
both come from families with a history of living well beyond age 90.
Even though we don’t need the extra income while I’m working, she would
like to begin taking her benefit at age 62. We know this will have an
impact on the amount of benefit she will receive, but once I start
taking my Social Security, she can switch to a higher spousal benefit,
correct?

That’s kind of correct but not the complete story.

For those
born between 1943 and 1954, full retirement age for Social Security
benefits is 66. Benefits will be reduced by 25 percent if they are taken
at age 62. It’s nice that you can continue to work and delay your
Social Security benefits.

As you probably
know, this will increase your full retirement benefit by 8 percent for
each year you delay after your full retirement age. There is no benefit
of delaying past age 70. Delaying benefits to age 70 will not only give
you a higher benefit during your lifetime; it will also provide your
wife with the highest survivor benefit should you die before she does.
This higher amount will also be of benefit as cost of living adjustments
(COLAs) are calculated.

Read more of this article.

Social Security Optimization:  The strategy for guaranteeing your maximum benefits is complex and requires some forethought.  NewRetirement.com has the resources that can help you decide how best to proceed.



NewRetirement Blogs Home