Archive for the 'About Reverse Mortgages' Category

Reverse Mortgages may be Riskier for Younger Retirees

A reverse mortgage taken too early could be a mistake, a New York Times article published last month points out. Homeowners who wait until age 72, as supposed to the minimum age of 62; to take out a reverse mortgage will get considerably more money. Gathering input from consumer advocates, the Times addresses what it finds as potential downsides for people taking reverse mortgages at a younger age and concludes that homeowners at or near retirement should work with a financial planner or a lawyer specializing in estates to make sure they have a clear plan for the next 20 years of living expenses

A reverse mortgage allows people age 62 and older to tap the equity they have in their home, pay no money to the bank as long as they stay in the home, and potentially have $1,000, $2,000, or more income each month. This may seem like a lifesaver, but like all other seemingly too-good to be true deals, it does run some risks.

According to Suze Orman, the biggest risk with a reverse mortgage is that while it can indeed be a viable way to generate income, it is very important to understand that after you take out a reverse mortgage you will still be responsible for paying the property tax, the insurance premium, and all the maintenance costs for your home. If you can’t continue to cover those costs you will risk losing your home to foreclosure.

Second, there are concerns over the expense of and use of the reverse mortgage proceeds. Some borrowers withdraw the maximum amount of equity ($625,500) because they think they should, rather than leaving it in a line of credit account to accumulate interest. Many borrowers also make the mistake of treating reverse mortgage proceeds as a windfall – when it is really a loan – and spend it on frivolous or lifestyle purchases, rather than on necessary living expenses.

Finally, borrowers also fail to realize that a reverse mortgage can affect their eligibility for certain government benefits, such as social security and Medicaid. According to Consumers Union, a ‘lump sum’ reverse mortgage payout may immediately put the elder above the asset limit for SSI/Medicaid and disqualify the senior for these important benefits, unless careful legal planning is done to avoid this result. Before obtaining a reverse mortgage then, all prospective borrowers should research the impact on the money they expect to receive from government entitlement programs.

Are you on the fence on whether or not you should receive a reverse mortgage? Take 30 seconds to use the Reverse Mortgage Calculator to help finalize your decision.

 

 

 

Reverse Mortgages More Popular Than Ever

It may be a new year, but it’s looking like the housing market may continue to be less than wonderful.  In some parts of the country, home values are still declining and many people can’t seem to sell their homes.  One of the ways seniors can tap into their home equity is to get a reverse mortgage.

It was reported in the Wall Street Journal that reverse mortgages are once again gaining steam.  More lenders are beginning to offer the product again that allows you to take a loan against the equity you already have in your home.  MetLife originated 171% more reverse mortgages in 2011 than they did in 2010!  The program is tailored for homeowners ages 62 and up who want to stay in their home for a while and want to eliminate their monthly mortgage payments.

We can help you find a reputable lender in your area that can give you information on the program and tell you exactly how much money you can qualify for.

Sign up for our monthly reverse mortgage newsletter!

Group Helping Seniors Stay in Their Homes

Stories of people doing good things are hard to come by and that’s why we wanted to include one in our blog.  It’s no secret that many seniors throughout the U.S. are having a difficult time staying in their homes as values continue to decline.  One option that could help seniors is getting a reverse mortgage, and a non-profit organization in North Carolina is helping do just that.

The Foundation For Homeowners is a group that helps seniors by providing free counseling services to those in danger of losing their homes.  People never want to be forced from their homes against their will and through reverse mortgages, the foundation can help seniors continue to stay in their homes.  The president of the foundation, Lolita Stevenson said, “We focus only on those seniors that want the reverse mortgage but are not qualifying for various reasons.”  The foundation works with the homeowner to make any repairs that may need to be done to get them up to code for a reverse mortgage loan.  Sometimes they may even be able to work with homes that may be considered a short sale.  Currently, The Foundation For Homeowners is counseling between 15 and 20 seniors a month and their success rate for getting seniors reverse mortgages is between 70-75%.

Thinking about getting a reverse mortgage?  See if one is right for you.

See how strong your current retirement strategies are by using our Retirement Calculator.

Sign up for one of our newsletters.

 

MetLife To The Rescue!

Still wanting to get a Reverse Mortgage but worried about the recent news of Wells Fargo exiting the business?  There’s no need to fear!  According to Brian Lewand,  Senior Vice President and Managing Director of MetLife, the nation’s third largest Reverse Mortgage competitor after Wells Fargo and Bank of America, is ramping up efforts to increase their growth in the market.  Though they aren’t giving up their entire game plan just yet, it has been noted that they have begun to extend warehouse lines of credit to mortgage banking firms that originate reverse mortgages.

And MetLife isn’t the only company to do so.  Peter Bell who heads up the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association has said that many new companies are moving into the Reverse Mortgage business.

Does the exit of the top two players in Reverse Mortgages still make you nervous?  What are your opinions on Reverse Mortgages?  Let us know your opinion!

Read the full article, here.

Thinking about a Reverse Mortgage?  We can help you find a reputable lender.

Sign up for one of our informational newsletters!

A Reverse Mortgage Case Study from the New York Times

While not for everyone, the New York Times documented a good
example of someone who should very much consider a Reverse Mortgage. 

The article also highlights the difficulties facing retirees
who: have debt, are single or are female. 

What are you worried
about in retirement?

Seniors group sues US HUD over reverse mortgages

Yahoo News, March 8th, 2011

The largest advocacy group
for U.S. seniors sued the Obama administration on Tuesday over
policy changes it says make it easier for older Americans to
lose their home to foreclosure…

Read this article.

Editor’s Notes:  The lawsuit here relates to a change that HUD made in the reverse mortgage program back in 2008.  If a reverse mortgage titleholder dies, and his spouse is not a titleholder on the property, then she will be required to pay off the loan in order to keep the home.  The key point is, however, that she will be required to pay off the entire loan, even if the home is worth less than the balance of the loan at that time.

This violates one of the major provisions of the reverse mortgage program, that homeowners are not required to pay back anything beyond the value of the home, no matter what.  The lawsuit alleges that HUD’s rule changes made this situation possible, and indeed, there’s a number of homeowners who have been foreclosed upon in these exact scenarios.

As always, here at NewRetirement, we aren’t in the business of giving advice, nor of telling people what they should and shouldn’t do with their money.  But if this isn’t evidence that both titleholders should get a reverse mortgage jointly, rather than with only one titleholder on the property, then we don’t know what is.  A single reverse mortgage, leaving a younger spouse without title to the home, is an extremely risky enterprise, and can, theoretically, lead to results like this.

Get more details about the risks and benefits of a Reverse Mortgage

Reverse Mortgages Face Another Makeover

US News & World Report, March 4th, 2011

Reverse mortgages are set for their second major change in less than a
year. Growing problems with loan defaults—estimated to have increased
in recent years to about 5 percent of all outstanding reverse
mortgages—have prompted regulators at the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development to begin drafting new oversight rules. They
would require loan applicants to demonstrate their ability to pay property taxes
and home insurance premiums on their properties. The rules would apply
to the government’s home equity conversion mortgage (HECM) program,
under which nearly all reverse mortgages are made.

Reverse mortgages have been hailed by supporters as a way for
cash-strapped seniors (the youngest borrower in a household must be at
least 62 years old) to tap a portion of the equity in their homes and
free themselves from future mortgage payments. Under the terms of a
reverse mortgage, the loans are, in effect, paid off to lenders using
the remaining equity in the home that has not been paid to homeowners.
Homeowners can stay in their homes as long as they’re able, even after
these repayments and loan fees have exhausted all of the remaining
equity in the home.

However, the fees for reverse mortgages have been criticized by
consumer groups as too high. And there were past abuses in which
aggressive marketers convinced seniors to take out reverse mortgages
and put the loan proceeds into expensive investments that were not in
their best interest.

Last fall, the Federal Housing Administration—the arm of HUD that
oversees the HECM program—introduced a new HECM Saver loan that
features very low upfront fees. It also pays out a smaller percentage
of a homeowner’s equity than a standard HECM loan. This provides a
larger equity cushion against loan losses and possible claims on the
FHA insurance that provides safeguards to HECM borrowers and lenders.

Now, another large change in the program is under discussion, driven
by the growing number of loans that are in default. While reverse
mortgage borrowers no longer have to make mortgage payments to stay in
their homes, they do have to pay taxes, insurance, and other upkeep expenses.

Read more of this article.

About Reverse Mortgages:
  Reverse mortgages do change as the regulations that support their existence are adjusted by the government in response to pressures and uncovered abuses.  We strongly recommend keeping up to date on the program by getting all the information you can.

Reverse Mortgage Origination Fees Make a Comeback

Reverse Mortgage Daily, February 16th, 2011

With the recent increase in reverse mortgage rates
and lower premiums from the secondary market, originators are are
finding it increasingly difficult to make enough on their loans without
charging an origination fee.

In past years, brokers saw back end pricing increase and were able to
pass some of that money along to the consumer, by forgoing origination
fees. Waived fees were commonplace and became expected by those applying
for reverse mortgages. Not anymore.

“We’re making nothing on the back end, so we’re forced to have fees,”
says Teague McGrath, vice president of marketing for
Orange-Calif.-based American Advisers Group (AAG). “We can’t survive on
the [current prices]…we are forced to do something.”

McGrath says origination fees are already being reintroduced
throughout the industry, and they are making it very difficult for
private lenders to compete with big banks. “It drives a wedge between us
and them,” says McGrath.

AAG, which posted 658 reverse mortgages in 2010, may have a different take from that of smaller industry players.

“I don’t think the fees made a big difference to our business. It’s
six of one, half dozen of the other,” says Mike Gruley, of Plymouth,
Mich.-based 1st Financial Reverse Mortgages. “Even though we commonly
see in the media that reverse mortgages are expensive, our experience is
that consumers are not swayed by the cost; they’re swayed by not
knowing how it works.”

Additionally, brokers are waiting to see how they will be affected by
new loan officer compensation rules expected to take effect on April 1.
A recent webinar by the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association
on the topic of loan officer compensation discussed the new rules, how
they will potentially impact lenders and brokers, and acknowledged that
there are still questions remaining, pending clarification from the
Federal Reserve.

Read more of this article.

About Reverse Mortgages:
  As the variance in fees increases, it becomes more and more important for homeowners to get a broad view of what is available to them in terms of fees and interest rates.  Consider the options at NewRetirement.com

No Official Reverse Mortgage Complaints in Texas

Reverse Mortgage Daily, February 16th, 2011

Despite complaints from Consumer Reports about reverse mortgages,
none have been reported in the Lone Star State according to the Texas
Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending.

Chris Schneider, spokesperson for the department told the Fort Worth Star Telegram
it has had a few inquiries, but no official complaints.  ”If the public
has a concern, they can check with us to make sure the broker is
licensed and legitimate,” he said.

Consumers can file a complaint and it will be investigated, but so
far the department said it has no evidence of improper sales tactics in
on-site visits or reviews of mortgage brokers’ records, Schneider said.

Norma Garcia, publisher of Consumer Reports told the paper that the
reverse mortgage marketplace is seeing trouble in other parts of the
country, which could show up in Texas soon.

“Nationally, these loans have exploded in the past few years,” Garcia
said. “Many seniors have paid a mortgage or several mortgages in their
lifetime, but this is a very different product. We caution people to
take extra steps, meet with counselors and other professionals to
determine if this is best product for you.”

Read more of this article.

About Reverse mortgages:  Comforting as this news might be, there are of course less than reputable reverse mortgage companies in operation.  For that reason, NewRetirement.com vettes every single lender, broker, or reverse mortgage professional that we work with, such that only the most reputable of lenders make it into our network.  Find out more at NewRetirement.com.

Reverse Mortgages: Good For Seniors?

National Public Radio, February 16th, 2011

Bank of America
recently announced it would stop offering reverse mortgages to
customers. Reverse mortgages have been marketed toward elderly
homeowners, as a way to use equity of the property for extra cash. But
how exactly does it work and is it a good idea? In Tell Me More’s
regular “Money Coach” segment, personal finance contributor Alvin Hall
explains reverse mortgages to host Michel Martin, and lays out the pros
and cons.

MICHEL MARTIN, host:

And now we turn to
matters of personal finance. And if you’ve surfed TV stations recently,
you might’ve come across a commercial like this one.

(Soundbite of TV ad)

Mr.
FRED THOMPSON: hi, I’m Fred Thompson. And, you know, if you’re like a
lot of folks out there lately, then finances might be a little tight.
Well, maybe it doesn’t have to be that way. ‘Cause if you’re 62 years or
older and own your own home, then join hundreds of thousands of other
Americans who have used a reverse mortgage as a safe, effective
financial tool.

MARTIN: Now, this
advertisement is from the American Advisers Group and it’s just one of
the dozens out there promoting so-called reverse mortgages. Now,
recently, Bank of America announced it would stop offering this type of
mortgage that it could, quote, concentrate on traditional mortgages,
like, other nontraditional mortgage products like home equity loans.

The
learning curve might be steep for the average consumer, so, we’ve
called upon our money coach Alvin Hall to tell us more about what these
are and whether you might want one or not. Alvin, welcome back.

ALVIN HALL: Glad to be here.

MARTIN: So, what exactly is a reverse mortgage?

HALL:
A reverse mortgage is a loan made against a equity in your house. If
you’re 62 years or older and you really need some money, you can go and
apply for this and they will give you an amount of money based on the
equity in your house. It allows you to tap into it.

And
there’s some good things about this and some bad things. The bad things
are that usually these types of reverse mortgages come with huge
upfront fees. Organizations that hit you hard for the fees, so it ends
up being a huge percentage of the equity that you have in the house. But
for somebody’s who’s exhausted all options, this is sometimes a way for
them to stay in their home.

MARTIN: Now,
why would Bank of America get out of this area? It seems that there’s
this conflicting news on this point. On the one hand, last October, the
FHA, the Federal Housing Administration announced that it would offer
something called a home equity conversion mortgage, which is a type of
reverse mortgage, but now Bank of America says it’s getting out.

HALL:
Probably because of the fees. In the new mortgage structure, which is
called the home mortgage conversion, the home equity conversion
mortgage, the upfront fees have been reduced to .01 percent and that’s
pretty low. In the past they’ve been much, much higher. And I think it’s
just not as profitable for Bank of America. They’re going to spin it a
different way, of course. They’re going to say, you know, we’re going to
concentrate on our core business. But in reality, they’re just not as
attractive.

Read more of this article.

About Reverse Mortgages:  The debate concerning reverse mortgages has not abated, and many seniors are struggling with the decision of whether or not the program is a good idea for them.  Find out the facts about the program at NewRetirement.com



NewRetirement Blogs Home