In other news, be prepared for a media blitz this Labor Day weekend by the AARP as it attempts to prove to retirees that it is has no political leanings in the Healthcare Reform Debate.  They are rolling out with millions of dollars in advertising budget to convince people that they are only looking out to help its members in the Healthcare Debate.  This advertising is rolling out because of the fact the AARP lost 60,000 or so members who thought the association was flat out siding with Democratic camp.  This is yet another reason why I’m glad I have DVR. 

  Add to this problem the fact that life expectancy at birth is about 76 years old and life expectancy at 65 is now 17 years and there is something economically uneasy about the situation. As boomers are living longer, their medical expenses are increasing, so where are all the workers to cover these increasing costs? Well we don’t have enough workers to cover these expenses, so serious debate, as is happening now, must take place as to the next steps.  Someone, or rather a particular demographic, is going to have to cover the cost, so what is the best way to settle this without causing a generational debate. It seems boomers’ children are going to have to carry the weight of their parents but as Garver states in his article “Social Security Sets the Stage for Generational Warfare,” “Because boomers’ kids neither created the Social Security problem not let it fester more than 40 years, the problem is potentially one of generational warfare.  And boomers’ kids would hold the moral high ground by reminding their boomer parents about being taught to take responsibility for one’s own mistakes.

  There are many plans in the works about ensuring the future of Social Security and Medicare, and in a recent New York Times article, “A Basis is Seen for Some Health Plan Fears Among the Elderly” the boomers have some reason to fear about the future of Medicare as they have known it under the Obama administration.  In a Kaiser Family Foundation poll this month, only 23 percent of respondents over the age of 65 felt they would be better off if health reform passed. Younger respondents were more optimistic To many boomers Obama’s cutting of healthcare costs, and combined emphasis on effectiveness of certain programs has lead them to see that he wants to curb some of Medicare’s services.  Many are even going so far as to say that Obama is implementing so called “death squads” that will decide people’s medical fates in the last parts of their lives.  While these death squads are one extreme viewpoint and takeaway from a lengthy and constantly expanding (1,017 pages) reform bill, it still reflects as one Gallup poll released last month shows that by a 3-to-1 margin, seniors believe that reform will reduce their access to healthcare.  But as one article in the “Christian Science Monitor” points out “Why GOP sees Seniors as Crucial to Health Reform Battle” seniors are the ones with the time to attend town meetings, and they pay close attention to the details of their benefits. 

  Its going to be interesting to see if we will be able to find a common ground, where maybe if you are a senior who has enough money for private insurance you can wave benefits knowing that you will be benefiting from your children’s hard work.  As it seems right now, both sides are taking the extremes of the debate, but hopefully we find a middle ground because if we don’t it’s surely going to be an uphill battle.

It appears that the Senate leaders are leaning toward supporting the delay.

What does this mean? 

It means that wheelchairs, hospital beds, diabetic test kits and other medical equipment will continue to cost the government far more than it should – bloating the system with waste, costing the government and tax payers too much.

The New York Times reported today in an editorial that this legislation would save beneficiaries (seniors with Medicare) 26 percent on their co-payments and Medicare would save $125 million in the first year and as much as $1 billion a year if the program went nation-wide.

Mmmmm… How would you spend your own personal savings?  Can you think of a use for $1 billion a year?

 Why is congress delaying this cost saving legislation?

Apparently congress has bowed to pressure from the companies who lost the bids.  The big money lobbyists win again!

Why should we care?

Seniors and all Americans need to care about the financial health of Medicare because it is one of our nations’ greatest costs and a most treasured resource.  But, we won’t be able to sustain this program if Medicare does not become more efficient

Contact Your Senator and Congressperson

If you are interested in contacting your Senator or Representative about this legislation, you can locate their information here:

• House of Representatives: https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml

• Senate: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm