USA Today, February 21st, 2011
“Hell, no, we won’t go!”
That’s the answer I hear most often from seasoned
Baby Boomers when I ask if they’re getting ready to move to retirement
communities.
For starters, they don’t plan to
retire before 70. And most want no part of the elder islands where their
parents retreated from the hustle of city life into a largely
sedentary, age-segregated existence.
The
Village Movement is a popular alternative. The drivers of this movement
are feisty professional women in their 50s and 60s who are determined to
change the experience of aging by empowering and enabling adults to
remain in their own homes or apartments to the end of their lives.
The
movement, launched eight years ago in Boston with Beacon Hill Village,
has spread to Washington, Chicago, San Francisco and more than 50 other
cities. Hundreds more are in formation.
Boomers
now over 50 want to belong to communal families, networked into a
virtual village. It’s partly a resurgence of the commune spirit of the
1960s and a throwback to the villages of a pre-urbanized America, where
people looked out for one another through good times and bad.
Science
tells us today that anyone who hopes to enjoy a happy, healthy later
life needs to feel part of a larger group. Family members are not
enough.
We need to build new and diverse
friendships with people younger and older than ourselves — relationships
that are built on affection, not obligation.
Typically, the great majority of joiners in the Village Movement are women.
“It’s
the women who see the value of socialization,” says Bob Davis, the only
male board member of the 9-month-old Ashby Village in Berkeley, Calif.
“The men are happy in their workshops or reading or doing some solitary
activity.” Beneath this common divergence among couples is the fact that
the women anticipate becoming caregivers. The men expect to be cared
for by their wives.
Read more of this article.