Archive for the 'Insurance' Category Page 2 of 9



When the Assisted-Living Bill Balloons

The New York Times, December 7th, 2010

This fall, my father sat down for a semi-annual assessment with staff
members at his assisted living facility in Tinton Falls, N.J. They
decided his condition — at 72, he has advancing Parkinson’s disease —
necessitated an upgrade to the next level of care.

The meeting yielded an upgraded bill, too: a nearly 18 percent bump, about $12,000 a year.

Most assisted living residents foot the bill on their own or with
help from family. Cost increases typically come in two forms: annual
upticks to cover rising expenses, and more significant hikes
accompanying a move to the next tier of care, such as help with bathing
or dressing.

The annual rises can be daunting enough. The MetLife Mature Market
Institute recently reported that assisted-living costs climbed 5.2
percent from 2009 to 2010, to a national monthly average of $3,293,
outpacing both inflation and the interest earned on savings and bonds — a
problem for the elderly on fixed incomes.

But add a more expensive service package, and the bill can become
prohibitive. And as the costs soar, relations between families and the
facilities caring for elderly relatives can sour, said Miriam
Oliensis-Torres, who runs a geriatric care management firm, Geriatric
Support/Pathway Care, in Milwaukee.

Sometimes the reasons for the new status can be apparent, as when a
resident becomes incontinent. But the decision can also seem arbitrary.
If they disagree with it, residents and their families have to work at
maintaining quality care while simultaneously challenging the policies
of the institution providing that care. It’s a tricky balance.

The institutions often urge families to approach assisted living a
bit more realistically. “It’s important for people to remember that
their loved one is moving into assisted living because they need
services,” said David Kyllo, executive director of the National Center
for Assisted Living. “They’re not moving in because of a change in
address. It’s needs-driven.”

Those needs can change quickly. Residents average just 28 months in
assisted-living facilities, and their health almost always declines.

Such deterioration may shock the family; the consequences don’t have
to. Families should know ahead of time what will happen, and when, as a
resident progresses through care levels.

“In my experience, families at the time of admission are pretty
stressed,” said Ms. Oliensis-Torres. “It’s really worth their while to
step back and say, ‘Explain this contract in plain English.’ ” Lawyers
often prove helpful by reviewing a contract prior to moving in, she
added.

Read more of this article.

Long Term Care Insurance:  There is perhaps no greater argument for Long Term Care insurance than stories like the above.  Long Term Care insurance mitigates the costs of Long Term Care massively, and is therefore a vital component of any airtight retirement plan.

Medicare change smooth so far

Washington Post, November 30th, 2010

One of the most significant savings envisioned in the new health- care
law – limiting payments to the private health plans that cover 11
million older Americans under Medicare – is, so far, bringing little of
the turbulence that the insurance industry and many Republicans
predicted.

The law, which sets in motion the broadest changes to the U.S.
health-care system in decades, will hold down the amount of money the
government gives to Medicare Advantage plans, which are available to
patients who prefer a managed-care version of the program. The savings
is forecast to amount to $145 billion by the end of the decade.

Whether the payment changes are warranted was a contentious subplot in
the protracted debate over the legislation. Democrats argued
successfully that the private plans were being overpaid and could
withstand the changes. Republicans warned that such plans would raise
prices, lower benefits or cause defections from the program, stranding
the elderly people who rely on them.

Early clues to the actual effects have now materialized, as elderly
Americans may sign up for a health plan for 2011 during an enrollment
period through the end of the year, and the warnings of swift, serious
damage to the program are not borne out. Fewer health plans are
available for the coming year, but the decrease is largely for reasons
unrelated to the new law. Premiums have not jumped substantially, and
benefits have not tended to erode.


Plans drop out

According to federal figures, the number of plans that accept Medicare
recipients has fallen by about 13 percent from 2010, or slightly more
than 500 plans.

A closer look shows that about half those plans left Medicare because of
changes in federal rules that predate the sprawling overhaul law passed
by Congress in March, according to the figures from the Department of
Health and Human Services’ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS). And many of the others left as a result of deliberate efforts by
the CMS to merge or eliminate small, neighboring health plans with
similar benefits.

Read more of this article.

Supplemental Medicare Insurance:  Good as this news is, Medicare is still not equipped to cover every contingency you may encounter in retirement.  For that, there are a host of insurance programs designed to supplement medicare.  Find out if any are right for you at NewRetirement.com

Income Security in Your 80s, Bought in Your 60s

The New York Times, November 4th, 2010

WOULD you be willing to place a bet that you’ll live past the age of 80? What about 85?

A relatively new product, known as longevity insurance,
allows you to put money on those odds — and the longer you can beat
them, the more money you stand to collect. But the point isn’t about
making a ghoulish gamble. The insurance is a way to protect you from
running out of money should you live to a ripe old age, though it turns
your retirement years into something of a contest with the insurance company.

At its core, longevity insurance is simply a deferred annuity: you hand
over a pile of cash to an insurance company, usually around the time you
retire. But the guaranteed payments begin much later, usually around 80
or 85, and last for the rest of your life. As with homeowner’s policies
and other types of insurance, the idea is to give up a smaller amount
of money now, for a potentially larger payout later.

Though many retirees are loath to part with thousands of dollars for a
benefit they may never receive, some baby boomers may decide it’s worth
the gamble. Consider this: for a healthy 65-year-old couple, there is a
50 percent chance that at least one of them will live until 92,
according to the Society of Actuaries.

Even if you don’t live that long, the insurance removes some of the
uncertainty of how much you can afford to spend in retirement. If you
know you have a guaranteed stream of income that will kick in at age 85,
for instance, you may be able to spend down your portfolio a little
more aggressively before then. The idea is to buy enough insurance so
that you’ll be able to maintain your lifestyle after the payments begin.

Read more of this article.

Retirement Calculator:  Longevity Insurance is an exciting new product for healthy retirees, but how best to integrate it into an overall retirement plan?  Consider using our Retirement Calculator to get an idea of how to do just that.

5 ways to make retirement savings last

Bankrate, November 24th, 2010

This is not your father’s retirement.

Chances
are, Dad left the company with a gold watch, a pension that included
health insurance and a Social Security check he could count on. His life
expectancy past retirement was fewer than 10 years — so those
resources weren’t stretched.

The picture will be
decidedly different for people who retire in the next 20 years — no
watches, no pensions or health insurance in most cases; a shaky Social
Security system; and a life expectancy of at least 20 more years.

Even
if you’ve planned carefully and your retirement nest egg is hefty,
there’s always a possibility that you’ll outlive — or outspend — your
money.

1. Buy longevity insurance 

The
concept isn’t new, but insurance companies have tweaked how these
single premium annuities pay out to provide nervous baby boomers with
additional cash just when they are likely to need it most.

You
give the insurance company a relatively small chunk of change at age
65. The insurance company invests it until you turn 80 or 85 and then
begins paying you monthly payments for the rest of your life. A typical
policy might cost $25,000 at age 65 and pay out $3,000 per month
beginning at age 85.

The money comes at a point in
life when you’re likely to start having hefty medical bills combined
with 20 years’ worth of inflation that may have diminished your
resources. This approach also makes long-term planning easier because
the payout is determined when you buy the policy. You can confidently
spend more of your other assets if you know they’ll be replenished at a
predetermined point.

The biggest drawback is that if the grim reaper comes early, you won’t get your money’s worth.

“It’s
really inexpensive,” says Ted Mathas, chief operating officer of New
York Life Insurance Co., “because half the people will never get there,
and if they do, they’ll only live three or four years beyond that
threshold. So the cost is a fraction of what it might be if they had to
manage these assets for 20 years. It provides great security in a
defined period of time.”

Read more of this article.

Retirement Calculator:  All of these are excellent suggestions, in the opinion of the NewRetirement Editorial staff at least, but integrating them into a coherent plan requires the use of a planning tool or calculator to get you started.  Consider the options at NewRetirement.com.

Do you need longevity insurance?

Reuters, November 22nd, 2010

We insure our homes against the risk of theft and fire, and our cars
for the risk of an accident. But how about insuring ourselves for the
risk of living too long?

The odds are rising that more Americans will run out of money in old age.
Average longevity is rising dramatically at a time when many older
Americans are struggling with damaged retirement accounts, unemployment
and rising expenses for healthcare.

Meanwhile, Social Security
is on track to replace less pre-retirement income in the years ahead,
due to a higher full retirement age mandated back in 1983 and Medicare
Part B premiums; any further cuts implemented now as part of
deficit-cutting would erode Social Security’s value even further.

Earlier this year, the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI)
reported that many American households in all income brackets won’t have
enough cash in retirement to meet expenses in retirement. EBRI’s 2010 Retirement Readiness Rating
study projected that almost one-third of Americans in the
second-highest income bracket will run out money after 10 to 20 years in
retirement. And, nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of Americans in the two
lowest pre-retirement income brackets will run short 10 years out.

Think longevity insurance sounds like a good idea? If so, you’re in
league with a handful of major insurance companies who have started
offering such policies in the past few years. Longevity insurance
policies are deferred income annuities that issue payments only when –
and if — you hit an advanced age. It’s a variation on the plain-vanilla
single premium immediate annuity (SPIA), wherein you fork over a chunk
of cash to an insurance company at retirement, in return for lifetime
checks that start immediately.

Longevity policies are much less expensive than SPIAs because of the
deferred benefit feature – the insurance company gets to invest your
money for a longer period, and if you don’t hit the target age you’ll
never collect. For example, Hartford Financial Services Group
quotes a joint and survivor longevity policy for a married 65-year-old
couple at $49,779, which would pay a $1,500 monthly benefit when they
reach age 85. That’s far less than the $314,913 it would charge that
same couple for an immediate annuity offering the same monthly payout.

Read more of this article.

New Way To Pay For Elderly Care: ‘Reverse Mortgage’ On Life Insurance

The Los Angeles Times, November 16th, 2010

People typically pay for expensive nursing-home care or in-home care
with money from long-term care insurance or cash received from a reverse
mortgage, but The Hartford is having success selling a new alternative.

It’s a rider on a permanent life insurance policy that allows the
policyholder to draw down on the amount of money that would be paid at
death to a beneficiary. For example, if you are paying premiums on a
$500,000 permanent life insurance policy, some or all of that amount
could be withdrawn if you become chronically ill. It works a little
something like a reverse mortgage in that the policyholder is
withdrawing from the total value of an asset.

To withdraw money from the death benefits, the policyholder must be
“chronically ill” for the rest of her or his life, which has to be
affirmed annually by a doctor. The rider doesn’t require a policyholder
to submit receipts to verify expenses, a requirement with most long-term
care policies.

The Hartford Financial Services Group
defines chronic illness as either a cognitive impairment that requires
substantial supervision to protect a person’s health or safety, or a
condition that renders a person unable to perform at least two
activities of daily living for 90 days or more — such as bathing,
dressing, going to the toilet or eating.

The LifeAccess rider was first sold by The Hartford
in May 2007, but it wasn’t offered in Connecticut until September. So
far, it’s been a popular alternative to long-term care insurance, said
Robert Pokorski, The Hartford’s chief medical strategist.

Read more of this article.

Long Term Care Insurance:
  This new program promises to take the place of Long Term Care Insurance, and for many it will likely do so.  At NewRetirement, we don’t endorse one program over another, and so we recommend you look into all the options to decide for yourself.

When a Safety Net Is Yanked Away

The New York Times, November 12th, 2010

November is long-term care awareness month, and to celebrate, a big player in the long-term care insurance industry announced on Thursday that it wanted to get as far away from the business as possible.

Citing well-known challenges to the long-term care insurance industry (but without really saying what they were), MetLife
said that it would stop underwriting new long-term care policies for
individuals after Dec. 30. The company will also cease new enrollments
to group and other plans, say, through an employer.

The company added that it would continue paying claims on existing
policies as long as customers continued paying premiums. Many of them
may not, however, since MetLife recently asked state insurance
regulators for permission to raise premiums on many policies by as much
as 44 percent.

It wasn’t the only company not charging enough for its policies. The two
leading players in the industry are trying to raise prices, too.
Genworth Financial is seeking an 18 percent increase on older policies
held by about 25 percent of its customers. And John Hancock has filed
for permission to raise premiums for about 80 percent of its customers
by an average of 40 percent. It has also temporarily stopped offering
new long-term care insurance plans through employers while it tries to
figure out what to charge.

State regulators may not bless these requests. But it suggests how far
off the companies were in pricing their products.

So now that you’re aware of the situation, a question presents itself: Is long-term care insurance doomed?

Let me start by saying that this is a separate question from whether you
should plan ahead for the possibility of many hundreds of thousands of
dollars in long-term care costs. You should. One big risk here is facing
down a $100,000 annual care bill for years on end and having no savings
or insurance. Even if you have a decent amount of savings, you could
spend everything and leave your spouse (more often than not a woman)
with nothing to live on.

Wealthy people can pay for their own care. And Medicaid
covers long-term care for people with no assets, though they may not be
able to get the care they want where they want it.

Everyone else either has to save for the possibility that they’ll need
care for years or buy insurance to cover the cost. If you’re wondering
how likely you may be to make a claim, well, the insurance industry has
had some trouble figuring that out, too.

Want some evidence? In the last decade, 11 companies that were once in
the top 10 in market share in this area have bailed out, according to
Limra, an industry research group.

A MetLife spokeswoman, Karen Eldred, didn’t want to add to the company’s statement from Thursday. She was more communicative earlier this month when I was finishing a column about long-term care planning.

Read more of this article.

Long Term Care Insurance:  What does this upheaval mean for those looking to purchase Long Term Care Insurance?  The market for programs is becoming tighter, and it might now be a good time to consider pulling the trigger on this insurance product.  Consider the options at NewRetirement.com

MetLife Steps Back From Long-Term Care Market

The Wall Street Journal, November 12th, 2010

MetLife
Inc. said it will halt sales of long-term-care insurance, a type of
coverage that repeatedly has flummoxed insurers and forced some to pay
significantly more in claims than they expected.

MetLife is among the bigger sellers of the coverage, with about
600,000 policyholders, or about 8%, among the eight million who have
long-term-care insurance in the U.S., according to the company and an
industry trade association.

MetLife joins a parade of insurers that have exited the business
rather than try to fight for customers in the small market. Many life
insurers, having suffered losses in the financial crisis, have been
rethinking product lines from long-term care to retirement offerings to
reduce their exposure to volatile markets.

In addition, they said, customers have held on to the policies at a
rate many insurers didn’t expect. Those lower lapse rates in the first
years of the policy translate into more people filing claims years
later.

“In any environment, it’s expensive for the companies that sell it,
and it has tremendous future risks associated with it,” he said. “The
current economic situation makes this an especially difficult business
right now.”

Allianz SE and Minnesota Life Insurance Co., a subsidiary of Securian
Financial Group Inc., are among the companies that halted sales of
long-term-care insurance in the last two years. Cutting off new sales
doesn’t affect existing customers as long as they keep paying premiums.

Policies sold years ago still are creating problems for some companies. CNO Financial Group
Inc., formerly Conseco Inc., spun off a long-term-care company with
more than 140,000 customers to an independent trust in 2008 to cap its
losses after plowing more than $1 billion into the unit that sold the
policies.

Read more of this article.

Long Term Care Insurance:  With Metlife out of the game, the remaining providers of long term care insurance will be restructuring to try and capture some of that new market.  As a result, this may be the proper time to inquire about Long Term Care Insurance.  Find out more at NewRetirement.com

Be Alert to Protect Yourself Against Medicare Fraud

The New York Times, October 29th, 2010

THIS month, more than 40 members of what is said to be an
Armenian-American crime syndicate were arrested and charged in an
extensive Medicare
fraud. Prosecutors say the suspects stole the identities of doctors and
thousands of patients, using them at more than 100 bogus health clinics
in 25 states to bill Medicare for more than $100 million.

On Oct. 21, officials at a chain of mental health
clinics in Miami were charged with making $200 million in fraudulent
claims for group therapy sessions that authorities said were
unnecessary or never provided.

Medicare scams like these are rampant, costing taxpayers billions of
dollars every year. But the schemes are not always so ambitious.

Thieves may simply offer unsuspecting patients medical supplies and
equipment they do not need, or do not qualify for, to collect Medicare
numbers, said Julie Schoen, director of the California Senior Medicare
Patrol, part of a federally financed anti-fraud program that operates
in every state.

The swindlers then bill for other supplies and services the patients
never received and pocket the reimbursements. Another common ruse is to
offer free services, such as cholesterol or diabetes screenings, to get Medicare numbers.

Medicare recipients caught up in these crimes rarely face financial liability, but compromised medical and insurance records may cause them problems later.

“One woman called me saying her father needed a wheelchair but Medicare
denied it, saying he had already had a wheelchair for five years,” said
Makeba Huntington-Symons, program manager for the Florida Senior
Medicare Patrol in St. Petersburg. “His Medicare number and his records
were compromised, and he didn’t know it.”

Some Medicare recipients apply for long-term care or other insurance and
find they do not qualify because their medical records are full of
fraudulent treatments and tests, Ms. Schoen said. Medicare fraud raises
the cost of Medicare premiums for everyone. And when scams get
particularly popular, Medicare cracks down on eligibility, making it
more difficult for those who really do need, say, a motorized wheelchair
or hospice services.

Read more of this article.

New Way To Pay For Elderly Care: ‘Reverse Mortgage’ On Life Insurance

The Los Angeles Times, November 2nd, 2010

People typically pay for expensive nursing-home care or in-home care
with money from long-term care insurance or cash received from a reverse
mortgage, but The Hartford is having success selling a new alternative.

It’s a rider on a permanent life insurance policy that allows the
policyholder to draw down on the amount of money that would be paid at
death to a beneficiary. For example, if you are paying premiums on a
$500,000 permanent life insurance policy, some or all of that amount
could be withdrawn if you become chronically ill. It works a little
something like a reverse mortgage in that the policyholder is
withdrawing from the total value of an asset.

To withdraw money from the death benefits, the policyholder must be
“chronically ill” for the rest of her or his life, which has to be
affirmed annually by a doctor. The rider doesn’t require a policyholder
to submit receipts to verify expenses, a requirement with most long-term
care policies.

The Hartford Financial Services Group
defines chronic illness as either a cognitive impairment that requires
substantial supervision to protect a person’s health or safety, or a
condition that renders a person unable to perform at least two
activities of daily living for 90 days or more — such as bathing,
dressing, going to the toilet or eating.

The LifeAccess rider was first sold by The Hartford
in May 2007, but it wasn’t offered in Connecticut until September. So
far, it’s been a popular alternative to long-term care insurance, said
Robert Pokorski, The Hartford’s chief medical strategist.

Read more of this article.

About Reverse Mortgages:  This is one of many programs to build off of the successful Reverse Mortgage model from home equity lenders.  Consider the details of their similarities and differences at NewRetirement.com



NewRetirement Blogs Home