Archive for the 'Pensions' Category

What is your Pension Really Worth?

This is a contribution from Bud Hebeler who runs Analyzenow.com

Lots of people plan to retire on a pension and Social Security with little savings.  They have never done any serious retirement planning or sought any professional help. That can be a very big mistake unless they have taken into account the damage that can come from future inflation.

Inflation for retirees is a very serious matter.  My own pension lost 30% of its purchasing power in the first ten years.  Inflation compounds, just as do returns.   My father retired in 1965 and lost considerably more than that on his long-term bonds because of the oil crisis and Carter year’s inflation.  During those years, inflation destroyed 49% of the value of a dollar in just ten years.  See Figure 1.

During my father’s time as well as my early years of retirement, medical costs rose at about the same rate as the Consumer’s Price Index, CPI.  That’s because there were less exotic medical treatments and drugs.  Drug bills of $1,000 a month or more were unheard of as were hospital bills of thousands each day.  The fact is that retirees, especially those who are less healthy or elderly, will face inflation much higher than the general population.

Fig. 1 shows how dramatically inflation destroys $10,000 fixed payment annuity or pension.  Most people assume that inflation in the past was always around 3% but it has gone as high as 13.3%.  For most of the period after World War II, inflation averaged over 4%.  For the 35 years in Fig. 1, inflation averaged 5%.

The often quoted 3% inflation rate includes the years of the Great Depression and the Price Controlled years of World War II.  That’s not to say that we, too, won’t face depressions or price controls, but the need to print money with our current national debt problem points to higher inflation, not lower than historical averages.

I’m now telling people that, at the very least, they should multiply their estimated after-tax payments from a fixed pension or annuity times their age divided by 110 to get a better idea of its value in an inflationary environment.  I used to say to divide by 100, but I now believe that future returns will be lower than the past, and I believe that we will see inflation higher than the 3% often quoted.

Employers often mislead employees about the value of a pension.  People who are getting close to retirement should look at the payments they are promised from their pension realistically.  Employer quotes of future pensions can be terribly misleading.  They may assume some wage growth that older employees are unlikely to achieve.  They may not show the sizeable reductions from including a spouse as a beneficiary.  And they won’t show the deductions for maintaining an employer offered health insurance program nor withholding.  Even worse, they certainly won’t show the effect of inflation either from now until they retire or the devastating results after retirement.

Retirees on fixed income really feel the pinch from inflation.  That’s why we try to find inflation-adjusted income from secure sources.  But even those will not keep up with the kind of inflation many of the elderly will find with ever increasing medical costs.   Corporate and municipal bonds are extraordinarily vulnerable to inflation.  Bond funds will do worse when interest rates start to rise.  More secure and inflation-adjusted investments are Savings I Bonds, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) that are laddered and held to maturity, and inflation-adjusted annuities.  It’s getting harder and harder to find the latter because insurers are afraid of what might happen to inflation in the future.  That’s true of long-term-care insurance as well.

How about those who have already retired?  Many people have already retired on a fixed pension or a fixed payment annuity and have too little savings.  They have already faced the reality of what spousal benefits, insurance deductions and withholding mean to their take-home income.  They don’t want to pay for professional advice, and they don’t want to take the time to make a plan of their own using a free Web program.  So, what’s a quick way to estimate how much they can really afford to spend?

If the savings are barely enough to provide reserves for an emergency fund and high value replacements like a new automobile, then they must rely on Social Security and a pension if they have one.  If they have savings in addition to an emergency reserve and a reserve for known large future expenses, they can get a fair idea of how much additional income they can get from investments (less reserves) by dividing the remaining investments by what they think may be the longest number of years they might still live.  This, in effect, is what the government makes you do when you take Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from an IRA after age 70 ½.  The RMD factors are life-expectancies plus about ten years in the seventies going down to about three years more than life-expectancies if you would live to 100.  People who have not reached age 70 yet could use age 95 less their current age to come close to the RMD assumptions for those younger ages.  See Figure 2 for a RMD table from IRS Publication 590, Appendix C.  Half of the population will live past life-expectancies, so you have to plan for the 50% chance you will live longer.  The extra years included in the RMDs do that nicely.

The theoretical assumption behind the analysis above is that the after-tax return equals inflation in each year, but it turns out that from a practical standpoint, this fits the experience of many retirees except in very recent years when it has been difficult to get such after-tax returns on fixed income securities plus miserable stock performance.

What if you are contemplating buying an immediate annuity?

You might first look for an immediate annuity that’s truly inflation-adjusted, not one that says payments will increase at 3%.  You should also look for a competitive quote for a fixed payment annuity.  Assuming that both come from very high quality insurers and have the same survivor options, you can use one of the immediate annuity programs from www.analyzenow.com to see which is best for your case.

If you can’t do that, you can get a reasonable idea which might be best for you by multiplying the quote for the fixed payment annuity times your current age / 110 as above.  If the resulting payment is significantly better than the inflation-adjusted quote, go for the fixed payment IF you feel you can maintain a separate reserve with secure investments that will have returns that are close to, or better than, inflation.  Such a reserve might be dominated by Savings I Bonds or TIPS.  The former is better for a non-qualified account (taxable) and the latter for a qualified account (IRA).

If you choose the fixed payment immediate annuity, then you can use some simple math each year to determine how much you must save from each payment for future inflation protection or how much you can withdraw.  You are going to be your own inflation insurance company.  This has an advantage.  If you die early, your heirs will inherit this reserve—or in some bad emergency, you could choose to use this reserve until you can sell your house or try to make up the shortage some other way.

That’s all there is to it.  Figure 3 illustrates the differences between simply spending all of the after-tax money from a fixed payment pension or annuity versus using the simple calculations above each year.  It’s not perfect inflation protection but it has the advantage of you having the investments from it rather than the insurer.  See Fig. 4 for investments.

Figure 3 shows that spending the whole of the after-tax payments requires a drastic change in life style throughout retirement as did my father how downsized his home three times.  Early in retirement, a retiree can spend a lot more, but this advantage disappears about at age 77.  For the following twenty years, the adjustments really pay off.  And those years are when health care is really expensive.

The other telling difference between the two methods is what happens to savings.  When you buy an immediate annuity or get a pension, it’s the insurer that has your savings—and you can’t get them back.  With the adjusted payment method you build up some savings.  This is illustrated in Figure 4.  If you end up using the investments for something else and can’t restore it, perhaps the worst that can happen is that you go back to the fixed payments spending at what will amount to greatly reduced purchasing power as illustrated with examples in Figures 1 and 3.

If you haven’t done any retirement planning, do it NOW!   You are going to be spending the last quarter to a third of your life without wages, and the future may be even tougher than the past.

  • If you would like to find out how much lifetime retirement income your savings could buy or want to look for a competitive quote for a fixed payment annuity, check out our Free Lifetime Annuity Calculator.
  • Continue Here to See all Ask Bud questions.
  • Ask Your Own Retirement Question here

Why you may NEVER Retire

When you were growing up, you most likely imagined yourself retiring at 65 and getting a secure monthly income from your pension, health care benefits, and social security. However, in this day and age, that is longer the case at all.

Let’s start with retirement pensions. According to this article from Yahoo Finance, between 1998 and 2010, the proportion of companies offering DB (defined benefits pension) plans fell from 67 percent to 17 percent while DC (defined compensation pension) plans rose from 10 percent to 58 percent. The overlying reason companies did this was to cut their costs and unless you have remarkable fortune investing, the DCs will deliver less income after you retire.

The dropping income does not help with retiring either. According to the September 2011 Census Bureau, an average family’s in the U.S fell 2.3 percent to $49,445 in 2010 and has dropped 7 percent since 2000 after adjusting to inflation. These numbers are the lowest since 1996.

The increase in childcare has also delayed retirement for many. According to the Census Bureau, the share of American families with dual-earning couples soared from 20.4 percent to 42.4 percent. This astonishing increase adds to parental stress and boosts childcare expenses for most families.

People’s insufficient returns from their asset portfolio has also caused many to keep working past the age of 65 – stocks have earned slightly more than 2 percent a year in the last decade – the average annual return of the S&P 500 between 2002 and 2012 has been 1.8 percent. Even long term investments do not look promising. The 10 – year Treasury note, for example, only pays 1.72% and to get a measly 2.8% return, you need to put aside your money for 30 years. In a nutshell, due to lower corporate contributions and a shift in the responsibility from the company to the employee to handle investments, annual returns are, on average, 6% to low.

Inadequate savings is one of the overlying reasons people retire later than they would like. According to the Employee Benefits Institute, 17 percent had more than $250,000 saved up in 2011. What is even more astounding is that 60% of the people surveyed had less than $60,000 saved. In short, many Americans do not have enough money saved up in order to retire at their desired age.

Keep these points in mind and plan for a safe retirement by using our Free Retirement Calculator.

 

Would a U.S. Default Mean Less Retirement Savings?

The world is waiting to see what the U.S. government will do in the upcoming days regarding a possible default.  Today, the Assistant Secretary of Labor, Phyllis Borzi announced that for retirement plans such as IRA’s and 401ks, a U.S. default would be “very, very disruptive.”  Why is this?  According to Borzi, the likelihood of investors wanting to invest would greatly decline due to fears that they would not be able to easily access their money due to withdrawal restrictions.  Pension funds would also be greatly affected because most of them are required to hold AAA bonds and U.S. treasuries.

Are you worried about your retirement funds if the government defaults?  What are your thoughts on the situation?

See how strong your retirement plan is by using our Retirement Calculator.

Sign up for one or more of our retirement newsletters!

 

Public Worker’s Benefits Will Most Likely Be Cut in New Jersey

This week, New Jersey lawmakers passed a bill that severely cuts the benefits of government workers and retirees.  This new legislation not only decreases union’s collective bargaining rights, it also raises retirement ages, increases the amount workers must now pay for their health insurance and suspends cost-of-living (COLA) increases to retirees’ pension checks,  The most shocking part of this bill is that it was passed in New Jersey, a state that is typically pro-labor with Democrats controlling both houses of the Legislature.

The move by New Jersey to strip workers of their previous benefits will save the state approximately $132 billion over the next 30 years.  But many argue that the state is fixing the problem by hurting those who have worked hard their entire lives for their state.  What do you think?  Have union’s become out of control and it’s time to reign them back in to help fix budget problems?  Or is this a case of the working class having to bear the brunt of a broken system?

Read more here in the article, “New Jersey Legislature Moves to Cut Benefits for Public Workers.”

Sign up for one of NewRetirement’s newsletters!

Anger brews over government workers’ benefits

AP Newswire, March 8th, 2011

Pension Envy!  The Next Big Fight/Debate!?

You have probably read about the brouhaha in Wisconsin over
pensions.  More and more state and local governments find that they are not able
to pay for benefits that public employees have been promised.

A recent article from the Associated Press, “Anger brews over
government workers’ benefits,” summarizes the debate.  “At its heart, the issue
is this:  Some public workers get a sweet deal compared to other workers.  And
it’s taxpayers who pay for it.”

And there is mounting evidence that citizens are taking sides
in this debate.  A USA Today/Gallup poll last month found show that Americans
largely side with the employees, though about two in five that want government
pay and benefits reined in.

Read this article

Use the NewRetirement Calculator to assess your retirement plan.

Don’t have a Pension?  You could buy one.

A Path Is Sought for States to Escape Their Debt Burdens

The New York Times, January 20th, 2010

Policy makers are working behind the scenes to come up with a way to let
states declare bankruptcy and get out from under crushing debts,
including the pensions they have promised to retired public workers.

Unlike cities, the states are barred from seeking protection in federal
bankruptcy court. Any effort to change that status would have to clear
high constitutional hurdles because the states are considered sovereign.

But proponents say some states are so burdened that the only feasible
way out may be bankruptcy, giving Illinois, for example, the opportunity
to do what General Motors did with the federal government’s aid.

Beyond their short-term budget gaps, some states have deep structural
problems, like insolvent pension funds, that are diverting money from
essential public services like education and health care. Some members
of Congress fear that it is just a matter of time before a state seeks a
bailout, say bankruptcy lawyers who have been consulted by
Congressional aides.

Bankruptcy could permit a state to alter its contractual promises to
retirees, which are often protected by state constitutions, and it could
provide an alternative to a no-strings bailout. Along with retirees,
however, investors in a state’s bonds could suffer, possibly ending up
at the back of the line as unsecured creditors.

“All of a sudden, there’s a whole new risk factor,” said Paul S. Maco, a
partner at the firm Vinson & Elkins who was head of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of Municipal Securities during the Clinton administration.

For now, the fear of destabilizing the municipal bond
market with the words “state bankruptcy” has proponents in Congress
going about their work on tiptoe. No draft bill is in circulation yet,
and no member of Congress has come forward as a sponsor, although
Senator John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, asked the Federal Reserve chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, about the possiblity in a hearing this month.

House Republicans, and Senators from both parties, have taken an
interest in the issue, with nudging from bankruptcy lawyers and a former
House speaker, Newt Gingrich,
who could be a Republican presidential candidate. It would be difficult
to get a bill through Congress, not only because of the constitutional
questions and the complexities of bankruptcy law, but also because of
fears that even talk of such a law could make the states’ problems
worse.

Read more of this article.

Public Workers Face Outrage as Budget Crises Grow

The New York Times, January 1st, 2010

Ever since Marie Corfield’s confrontation with Gov. Chris Christie this fall over the state’s education cuts became a YouTube classic, she has received a stream of vituperative e-mails and Facebook postings.
“People I don’t even know are calling me horrible names,” said Ms.
Corfield, an art teacher who had pleaded the case of struggling
teachers. “The mantra is that the problem is the unions, the unions, the
unions.”

Across the nation, a rising irritation with public employee unions is
palpable, as a wounded economy has blown gaping holes in state, city and
town budgets, and revealed that some public pension funds dangle
perilously close to bankruptcy. In California, New York, Michigan and
New Jersey, states where public unions wield much power and the culture
historically tends to be pro-labor, even longtime liberal political
leaders have demanded concessions — wage freezes, benefit cuts and
tougher work rules.


It is an angry conversation. Union chiefs, who sometimes persuaded
members to take pension sweeteners in lieu of raises, are loath to
surrender ground. Taxpayers are split between those who want cuts and
those who hope that rising tax receipts might bring easier choices.

And a growing cadre of political leaders and municipal finance experts
argue that much of the edifice of municipal and state finance is
jury-rigged and, without new revenue, perhaps unsustainable. Too many
political leaders, they argue, acted too irresponsibly, failing to
either raise taxes or cut spending.

A brutal reckoning awaits, they say.

These battles play out in many corners, but few are more passionate than
in New Jersey, where politics tend toward the moderately liberal and
nearly 20 percent of the work force is unionized (compared with less
than 14 percent nationally). From tony horse-country towns to
middle-class suburbs to hard-edged cities, property tax and unemployment
rates are high, and budgets are pools of red ink.

A new regime in state politics is venting frustration less at Goldman Sachs
executives (Governor Christie vetoed a proposed “millionaire’s tax”
this year) than at unions. Newark recently laid off police officers
after they refused to accept cuts, and Camden has threatened to lay off
half of its officers in January.

Fred Siegel, a historian at the conservative-leaning Manhattan
Institute, has written of the “New Tammany Hall,” which he describes as
the incestuous alliance between public officials and labor.

“Public unions have had no natural adversary; they give politicians
political support and get good contracts back,” Mr. Siegel said. “It’s
uniquely dysfunctional.”

Read more of this article.

Alabama Town’s Failed Pension Is a Warning

The New York Times, December 22nd, 2010

This struggling small city on the outskirts of Mobile was warned for
years that if it did nothing, its pension fund would run out of money by
2009. Right on schedule, its fund ran dry.

Then Prichard did something that pension experts say they have never
seen before: it stopped sending monthly pension checks to its 150
retired workers, breaking a state law requiring it to pay its promised
retirement benefits in full.

Since then, Nettie Banks, 68, a retired Prichard police and fire
dispatcher, has filed for bankruptcy. Alfred Arnold, a 66-year-old
retired fire captain, has gone back to work as a shopping mall security
guard to try to keep his house. Eddie Ragland, 59, a retired police
captain, accepted help from colleagues, bake sales and collection jars
after he was shot by a robber, leaving him badly wounded and unable to
get to his new job as a police officer at the regional airport.

Far worse was the retired fire marshal who died in June. Like many of the others, he was too young to collect Social Security.
“When they found him, he had no electricity and no running water in his
house,” said David Anders, 58, a retired district fire chief. “He was a
proud enough man that he wouldn’t accept help.”

The situation in Prichard is extremely unusual — the city has sought
bankruptcy protection twice — but it proves that the unthinkable can, in
fact, sometimes happen. And it stands as a warning to cities like
Philadelphia and states like Illinois, whose pension funds are under
great strain: if nothing changes, the money eventually does run out, and
when that happens, misery and turmoil follow.

It is not just the pensioners who suffer when a pension fund runs dry.
If a city tried to follow the law and pay its pensioners with money from
its annual operating budget, it would probably have to adopt large tax
increases, or make huge service cuts, to come up with the money.

Current city workers could find themselves paying into a pension plan
that will not be there for their own retirements. In Prichard, some
older workers have delayed retiring, since they cannot afford to give up
their paychecks if no pension checks will follow.

Read more of this article.

Mounting Debts by States Stoke Fears of Crisis

The New York Times, December 4th, 2010

The State of Illinois is still paying off billions in bills that it got
from schools and social service providers last year. Arizona recently stopped paying for certain organ transplants for people in its Medicaid
program. States are releasing prisoners early, more to cut expenses
than to reward good behavior. And in Newark, the city laid off 13
percent of its police officers last week.

While next year could be even worse, there are bigger, longer-term
risks, financial analysts say. Their fear is that even when the economy
recovers, the shortfalls will not disappear, because many state and
local governments have so much debt — several trillion dollars’ worth,
with much of it off the books and largely hidden from view — that it
could overwhelm them in the next few years.

“It seems to me that crying wolf is probably a good thing to do at this point,” said Felix Rohatyn, the financier who helped save New York City from bankruptcy in the 1970s.

Some of the same people who warned of the looming subprime crisis two
years ago are ringing alarm bells again. Their message: Not just small
towns or dying Rust Belt cities, but also large states like Illinois and
California are increasingly at risk.

Municipal bankruptcies or defaults have been extremely rare — no state has defaulted since the Great Depression, and only a handful of cities have declared bankruptcy or are considering doing so.

But the finances of some state and local governments are so distressed
that some analysts say they are reminded of the run-up to the subprime
mortgage meltdown or of the debt crisis hitting nations in Europe.

Analysts fear that at some point — no one knows when — investors could
balk at lending to the weakest states, setting off a crisis that could
spread to the stronger ones, much as the turmoil in Europe has spread
from country to country.

Mr. Rohatyn warned that while municipal bankruptcies were rare, they
appeared increasingly possible. And the imbalances are so large in some
places that the federal government will probably have to step in at some
point, he said, even if that seems unlikely in the current political
climate.

“I don’t like to play the scared rabbit, but I just don’t see where the end of this is,” he added.

Read more of this article.

Retirement Calculator:
  How secure is your retirement plan?  Hopefully better than California’s and Illinois’, but perhaps not.  Find out what the best way forward is at NewRetirement.com.

2 Ways to Create a Personal Pension Plan

US News & World Report, November 8th, 2010

For the overwhelming majority of Americans, having secure retirement
income in the future doesn’t seem like a very sure thing. Consider the
traditional “three-legged stool” that past generations had in place to
support their retirement:

• First and foremost, a pension or some form of defined contribution
plan from a company where you have worked. Sadly, these plans have all
but disappeared. In their place are 401(k) plans where the
responsibility is on the individual to contribute to his or her
personal retirement.

• Second, Social Security. For those of us age 50 or younger, there
are serious concerns as to the long-term solvency of this program. At a
minimum, it would be realistic to assume that qualifying ages to
receive Social Security will continue to be raised, and perhaps even
some form of “means testing” introduced. The bottom line? Over the long
run, this benefit simply won’t continue as it always has, and in the
same form.

• The third leg is personal savings. In the past, savings were an
additional supplement to the above retirement finance components. With
the extinction of traditional pension plans and widely anticipated
alterations in the social security safety system, this is now the most
important leg of the stool.

The key for investors today is to find ways to translate personal
savings into more assured income streams in retirement—in effect, to
create one’s own personal pension plan. Here are two strategies that
most average investors can adopt:

Read more of this article.

Retirement Calculator:  Crafting a personal retirement plan is not easy, and requires both good information and a broad view of the options available to you.  Our Retirement Calculator can help you figure out what is available to you.



NewRetirement Blogs Home