<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NewRetirement Blog &#187; deflation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.newretirement.com/tag/deflation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.newretirement.com</link>
	<description>Covering retirement, financial, tax and political topics relevant to people planning for or living in retirement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>U.S. and UK on brink of debt disaster ?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.newretirement.com/2009/02/16/us-and-uk-on-brink-of-debt-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.newretirement.com/2009/02/16/us-and-uk-on-brink-of-debt-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.newretirement.com/2009/02/16/us-and-uk-on-brink-of-debt-disaster/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/20/us-and-uk-on-brink-of-debt-disaster/
This  is along the lines of the Barron&#8217;s interview. Private indebtedness increased  300% faster than GDP from 1970 on. Total public and private sector debt is over  355% of GDP. This debt cannot be serviced out of current cash flow; we either  need to restructure the debt on a massive level [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/20/us-and-uk-on-brink-of-debt-disaster/" title="blocked::http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/20/us-and-uk-on-brink-of-debt-disaster/">http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/20/us-and-uk-on-brink-of-debt-disaster/</a></p>
<p>This  is along the lines of the Barron&#8217;s interview. Private indebtedness increased  300% faster than GDP from 1970 on. Total public and private sector debt is over  355% of GDP. This debt cannot be serviced out of current cash flow; we either  need to restructure the debt on a massive level (bankruptcies, refinancing of  short term to long term debt) or inflate so nominal GDP increases fast enough to  service existing debt.</p>
<p>Still, given the commodities induced inflation  scare in the middle of &#8216;08, the path of inflation might not be a given or a free  lunch either. High inflation would probably squeeze margins for companies in the  face of weak demand and increase the amount of money needed for living expenses,  leaving less for debt servicing by consumers.</p>
<style> .hmmessage P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body.hmmessage { font-size: 10pt; font-family:Verdana } </style>
<p>I imagine the Fed really is trying to walk a fine line between deflation and  inflation. Either course would wreck the economy for years to come. However, the  Fed will feel real pressure from congress. What congress wants is another matter  altogether. Treasury and the administration I think understands that you can&#8217;t  keep gorging banks on loans to get it out of this mess. That&#8217;s why the Geithner  TARP revamp didn&#8217;t have specific requirements for increased bank lending from  government money. But they&#8217;re hesitant to take decisive action on this. People  know some of the largest banks are insolvent but we&#8217;re still playing the Fannie  and Freddie game of last summer with them. Congress of course wants increased  lending and wants Fannie and Freddie and FHA to swallow or guarantee every  defaulting loan out there and for the Fed to drive mortgage rates down to 0. The  administration also had to reign in their own party in the overreaching salary  caps put into the economic stimulus bill.</p>
<p>The question is not just  economic anymore, but also political so I don&#8217;t know if massive private  bankrupcties will be tolerated well either. I think I heard something like 2000  economists signed a letter against Smoot-Hawley during the great depression but  that peice of protectionism went through anyway.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your vote &#8211; deflation or inflation or do we get a series of bankruptcies and write downs first?</p>
<p>Courtesy of Yi</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.newretirement.com/2009/02/16/us-and-uk-on-brink-of-debt-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
